Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Shriram Shevabhavi Sanstha Belora Its President Shri Shriram Dipaji RathodversusDr Ramsdesmi N

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The contempt petition is disposed of because the order under contempt has been complied with.

Summary

Shriram Shevabhavi Sanstha filed a contempt petition (No. 532 of 2026) arising out of Writ Petition No. 2663 of 2025 against Dr. Ramsdesmi N. and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the order for contempt had been complied with. The Court examined the compliance claim and found it satisfactory. Consequently, the Court disposed of the contempt petition, granting the petitioner liberty to seek any further appropriate remedy for his grievance. No substantive discussion on the merits of the underlying writ was made, as the contempt issue was resolved.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order under contempt has been complied with by the respondents
  • Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed on the basis of compliance

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • high court
  • petition disposal
  • compliance
  • remedy

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41475-DB

                                                                              532.26CP

                                                  1

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             CONTEMPT PETITION NO.532 OF 2026
                              IN WRIT PETITION NO.2663 OF 2025
                                                  …
                            SHRIRAM SHEVABHAVI SANSTHA, BELORA
                                              VERSUS
                                   DR.RAMSDESMI N. & OTHERS
                                                  …
                             Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.B.B.Shinde
                          AGP for the respondent-State : Mrs.M.N.Ghanekar
                                                  ...
                                         CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
                                                      VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ.

                                       DATE      :    04.09.2026
                 P.C. :


                 1]            Not on board. Taken on board.

                 2]            The   learned   counsel   for   the   petitioner,   on

                 instructions, submits that the order under contempt is

                 complied with.

                 3]            In view of the same, the Contempt Petition stands

                 disposed of, with liberty to take out the appropriate remedy

                 for redressing grievance of the petitioner.




                 [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]               [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE]
                         JUDGE                              JUDGE

                 DDC


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.