Bombay High Court
MALLIKARJUN VISHWANATH KARBHARIversusPUNDLIK RANGNATH DESHMUKH AND ANR
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is disposed as there is nothing left to contend since the contempt order has been complied with.
Summary
The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with an earlier order. The respondent filed an affidavit-in-reply stating that it had complied by deciding the representation under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act and by making the required payment to the petitioner. The court examined the affidavit and found that the compliance was satisfactory. No further issue remained for adjudication. Consequently, the court held that there was nothing left to contend in the petition. The petition was therefore disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the respondent has complied with the order passed in contempt of court
Legislation cited
- Land Acquisition Act — s. 34
Subjects
- contempt
- Land Acquisition Act
- Section 34
- payment
- petition disposed
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42140
1 914 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 558 OF 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
914 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 558 OF 2012
IN WP/11758/2010
MALLIKARJUN VISHWANATH KARBHARI
VERSUS
PUNDLIK RANGNATH DESHMUKH AND ANR
...
Adv. N. B. Patil, AGP for Respondents-State
...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 09/09/2026
ORDER (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.) :-
. None for the petitioner.
2. From the affidavit-in-reply filed by respondent no.2 acquiring
body, it appears that the order under contempt is complied with by
deciding the representation under Section 34 of the Land
Acquisition Act and further by making the payment to petitioner.
3. In view of the same, nothing survives in this petition and the
same stands disposed of.
( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )
shivani/
Checking your session…