Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ST. FRANCIS DE SALES EDUCATION SOCIETY AND OTHERSversusJ. H. SAHARIYA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is disposed of as there is nothing left to adjudicate after compliance with the contempt order.

Summary

The petitioner, St. Francis De Sales Education Society, filed a contempt petition (No. 61 of 2014) alleging non‑compliance with a prior contempt order. The respondent, J. H. Sahariya, through counsel, submitted that the order had been complied with. The Court examined the submission and found that the compliance rendered the petition moot. Consequently, the Court held that there was nothing left to adjudicate in the contempt petition. The petition was therefore disposed of without any further order.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt petition remains maintainable after the alleged compliance with the contempt order.

Subjects

  • contempt
  • compliance
  • petition disposed
  • high court
  • civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41111

                                                            909 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 61 OF 2014




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             909 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 61 OF 2014
                                       IN WP/5547/2013

                           St. Francis De Sales Education Society And Others
                                                 Versus
                                       J. H. Sahariya And Another

                     __________________________________________________________
                     Adv. Kadam Vikram S. for the Petitioner
                     Mr. S. J. Salgare, A.G.P. for State
                     Adv. Omkar S. Shendkar h/f. Sr. Adv. Patil Bankar Deelip
                     N. for Respondent No. 2
                     __________________________________________________________


                                        CORAM     : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                    VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                        DATE      : SEPTEMBER 02, 2026


                     ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]

                     1.             Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                     the order under contempt is complied with.

                     2.             In view of the same, nothing survives in the

                     present        Contempt   Petition   and    the      same        stands

                     disposed of.



                     (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)              (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                               JUDGE                              JUDGE




                     Komal Kamble                                                 Page| 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.