Bombay High Court
ABHAYCHAND GOVINDJI SHAHversusPRAKASH MAHAJAN AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is disposed as the respondents have complied with the contempt order.
Summary
In a contempt petition filed by Abhaychand Govindji Shah against Prakash Mahajan and another, the petitioner’s counsel submitted that the respondents had complied with the earlier contempt order, as evidenced by an affidavit filed by Respondent No.1. The court examined the compliance claim and found it satisfactory. No further issues remained for adjudication. Consequently, the court held that there was nothing left to consider in the petition. The petition was therefore disposed of with no further orders.
Issues considered
- Did the respondents comply with the earlier contempt order?
- Is there any remaining ground for the contempt petition after compliance?
Subjects
- contempt
- compliance
- petition disposed
- High Court
- Aurangabad
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41112
910 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 63 OF 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
910 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 63 OF 2014
IN WP/2005/2012
Abhaychand Govindji Shah
Versus
Prakash Mahajan And Another
__________________________________________________________
Adv. B. R. Waramaa for the Petitioner
Mr. N. B. Patil, A.G.P. for State
__________________________________________________________
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 02, 2026
ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the order under contempt is complied with and the fact is
confirmed by filing affidavit-in-reply by Respondent No. 1.
2. In view of the same, nothing survives in the
present Contempt Petition and the same stands
disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 1
Checking your session…