Bombay High Court

SMT. MAYA SURYAKANT SONPUREversusSANTOSHKUMAR NAIKWADI AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: R M JOSHI

Holding

The court held that the respondents had complied with the directions by forwarding the bills to the Commissioner (Handicap Welfare), Pune, and therefore the petition was disposed.

Summary

Smt. Maya Suryakant Sonpure filed a petition seeking relief regarding pending salary bills. The respondents argued that the bills had been raised and forwarded to the Social Welfare Officer. The Social Welfare Officer further stated that the bills were subsequently sent to the Commissioner (Handicap Welfare), Pune, thereby complying with the court's directions. The court examined whether any outstanding relief remained for the petitioner. Finding that the respondents had duly complied with the mandated forwarding of the bills, the court concluded that there was nothing left to adjudicate. Consequently, the petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

Did the respondents comply with the court's directions by forwarding the pending salary bills to the appropriate authority?
Is there any remaining relief or claim for the petitioner after such compliance?

Subjects

pending salary
social welfare
handicap welfare
court directions
petition disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:23183




                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                CONT. PETITION NO. 636 OF 2024

                                   Smt. Maya Suryakant Sonpure
                                            VERSUS
                                 Santoshkumar Naikwadi And Others

           Mr. V. D. Gunale, Advocate for petitioner
           Mr. S. S. Manale, Advocate for respondent No. 1
           Mr. G. J. Karne, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3
           Mr. A. M. Gholap, Advocate for respondent No. 4

                                                  CORAM     : R. M. JOSHI, J.
                                                  DATE      : 12th JUNE, 2026

           PER COURT :-

           1.             Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 makes a

           statement on the basis of affidavit-in-reply filed in this Court that the

           bills are raised in respect of pending salary of the petitioner and the

           same are forwarded to the office of Social Welfare Officer.


           2.             Learned counsel for Social Welfare Officer makes a statement

           that the said bills are already forwarded to the Commissioner (Handicap

           Welfare), Pune. Thus, there is compliance of the directions by the

           present respondents. Hence, nothing survives in the petition.


           3.             Petition stands disposed of.



                                                                 (R. M. JOSHI, J.)

           B. S. Joshi




           922-Cont P-636-2024.odt                                               1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…