Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BHAGWAN NARAYAN NABDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is disposed as the order alleged to have been disobeyed has been complied with.

Summary

Petitioner Bhagwan Narayan Nabde filed Contempt Petition No. 72 of 2014 alleging that the State of Maharashtra had failed to comply with a prior court order. The State, represented by the Additional Government Pleader Ms. U.S. Bhosale, argued that the alleged disobedience had been remedied by the court's decision on the petitioner's representation. The bench examined the submissions and found that the order in question had indeed been complied with. Consequently, the court held that there was no longer any basis for contempt proceedings. The petition was therefore dismissed and the matter disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the State of Maharashtra was in contempt for alleged non‑compliance with the court's order.

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • compliance
  • petition disposed
  • high court order

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41113

                                                          911 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 72 OF 2014




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             911 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 72 OF 2014
                                       IN WP/9900/2010

                                          Bhagwan Narayan Nabde
                                                   Versus
                                    The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                     __________________________________________________________
                     Adv. L. S. Shaikh h/f. Adv. Sugdare A. D. for the Petitioner
                     Ms. U. S. Bhosale, A.G.P. for State
                     __________________________________________________________

                                       CORAM     : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                   VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                       DATE      : SEPTEMBER 02, 2026


                     ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]

                     1.             The learned A.G.P. submits that the order of

                     which disobedience is alleged by way of this petition is

                     complied with by deciding the representation of the

                     petitioner.

                     2.             In view of compliance of the order, nothing

                     survives in the present Contempt Petition and the same

                     stands disposed of.



                     (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)           (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                               JUDGE                           JUDGE




                     Komal Kamble                                               Page| 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.