Bombay High Court

TULSHIRAM BAJIRAO PALLEWADversusBIPIN SHARMA, COLLECTOR AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is disposed of as the Collector has complied with the contempt order.

Summary

The petitioner, Tulshiram Bajirao Pallewad, filed a contempt petition (905 Cont. Petition No. 78 of 2013) seeking compliance with a contempt order dated 31.07.2012 in Writ Petition No. 5224 of 2012. The order required Collector Bipin Sharma to forward an appropriate reply concerning an issue raised in a communication dated 18.06.2011. The Collector obtained the necessary report from the Sub‑Divisional Officer and submitted it, thereby satisfying the contempt order. The Court examined whether the Collector had complied with the directive. Finding that the Collector had indeed complied, the Court ordered the petition to be disposed of. No further relief or directions were granted.

Issues considered

Did the Collector comply with the contempt order dated 31.07.2012?
Should the contempt petition be dismissed on account of compliance?

Subjects

contempt of court
compliance
high court order
writ petition
disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39022


                                               1                   905 CONT. PETITION NO. 78 OF 2013



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                               905 CONT. PETITION NO. 78 OF 2013
                                       IN WP/5224/2012

                             TULSHIRAM BAJIRAO PALLEWAD
                                          VERSUS
                        BIPIN SHARMA, COLLECTOR AND OTHERS
                                             …..
            Adv. S. G. Shinde h/f Adv. P. G. Rodge, Advocate for the Petitioner
            Adv. A.S. Shinde, AGP for Respondents-State
                                             …..

                                        CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                        DATED : 27/08/2026
            Per Court:

            .          By way of order under contempt dated 31.07.2012 passed in

            writ petition No. 5224 of 2012 respondent No.1 Collector was

            directed to forward the appropriate reply in respect of the issue

            raised in communication dated 18.06.2011. Accordingly, the

            Collector, after calling the report from the Sub-Divisional Officer,

            has submitted the report. As such, the order under contempt is

            complied with.


            2.         In view of the same, the petition is disposed of.




            ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )

            shivani/

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…