Bombay High Court
SHAMSUDDIN MAHMULAL PATHANversusYASHWANT MARUTI KANTHODE
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court held that the contempt was purged as the respondent had complied with the earlier order, and therefore the petition stands disposed.
Summary
The petitioner, Shamsuddin Mahmulal Pathan, filed a contempt petition (No. 84 of 2026) arising from the order passed in Writ Petition No. 9140 of 2004 dated 26 September 2024. The respondent, Yashwant Maruti Kanhode, was alleged to have failed to comply with that order. The respondent's counsel submitted that full compliance had been effected, and the petitioner subsequently confirmed the same. The Court examined whether any contempt remained after the alleged compliance. Finding that the respondent had indeed complied, the Court held that the contempt was purged. Consequently, the contempt petition was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Did the respondent comply with the order passed in Writ Petition No. 9140 of 2004?
- Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed on the ground that the alleged contempt has been purged?
Subjects
- contempt
- compliance
- writ petition
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- order enforcement
Judgment
1 27-CP-84-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 84 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 9140 OF 2004
SHAMSUDDIN MAHMULAL PATHAN
VERSUS
YASHWANT MARUTI KANTHODE
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Tanaji V. Mhatugade
Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ketan Patil h/f. Ms. Pinku Bensari
...
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 23-04-2026
PER COURT:-
1. Heard.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the
respondent has complied the order passed by this Court, in Writ
Petition No.9140 of 2004, dated 26.09.2024. The same is
confirmed by the petitioner.
3. In view of the above, the contempt is purged, as such, the
petition stands disposed of.
[SACHIN S. DESHMUKH]
JUDGE
rrd
Checking your session…