Bombay High Court
SHAYAM TUKARAM KAMBLEversusVIKRAM KUMAR AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
Since the order under contempt has been complied with, the contempt petition stands disposed.
Summary
Petitioner Shayam Tukaram Kamble filed a contempt petition (No. 87 of 2014) alleging non‑compliance with a prior contempt order. The petitioner’s counsel, Adv. Shelke Manoj U., submitted that the order under contempt had been complied with. The Court, after noting the compliance, found no remaining ground for the petition. Consequently, the Court disposed of the contempt petition. No further relief or directions were issued.
Issues considered
- Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed on the ground that the order under contempt has been complied with
Subjects
- contempt of court
- compliance
- petition disposed
- High Court
- Aurangabad
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41114
912 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 87 OF 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
912 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 87 OF 2014
IN WP/943/2013
Shayam Tukaram Kamble
Versus
Vikram Kumar And Others
__________________________________________________________
Adv. Shelke Manoj U. for the Petitioner
Ms. M. N. Ghanekar, A.G.P. for State
__________________________________________________________
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 02, 2026
ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]
1. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that
the order under contempt is complied with.
2. In view of the same, nothing survives in the
present Contempt Petition and the same stands
disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 1
Checking your session…