Bombay High Court
BANABAI BAJRANG RAJPUTversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The direction to pay rental compensation was complied with, so the contempt petition stands disposed.
Summary
Petitioner Banabai Bajrang Rajput filed a contempt petition seeking enforcement of a direction dated 21 November 2011 and 2 December 2011 for payment of rental compensation. The State, represented by the Additional Government Pleader, submitted that the applications had already been decided and Rs.2,34,828 had been paid to the petitioner, with the cheque and receipt placed on record. The Court examined the evidence and found that the direction had indeed been complied with. Consequently, the Court held that there was no contempt. The petition was therefore disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the direction to pay rental compensation to the petitioner has been complied with
- Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed
Subjects
- contempt
- rental compensation
- compliance
- High Court
- petition disposed
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42159-DB
950 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 92 OF 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
950 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 92 OF 2014
IN WP/6332/2012
Banabai Bajrang Rajput
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
__________________________________________________________
• Adv. Kale Ajeet B. for the Petitioner - Absent
• Ms. U. S. Bhosale, A.G.P. for State
• Adv. Chillarge Subhash S. for Respondent No. 5 -
Absent
__________________________________________________________
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 08, 2026
PER COURT :
1) None for the petitioner.
2) The direction in this matter was to decide the
applications of the petitioner dated 21.11.2011 and
02.12.2011 for claiming rental compensation and, if the
petitioner is held entitled to the same, to pay the amount to
her.
3) The learned A.G.P., by pointing out the affidavit-
in-reply, submits that the aforesaid applications of the
petitioner have already been decided and an amount of
Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 2
950 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 92 OF 2014
Rs.2,34,828/- towards rental compensation has already
been paid to her.
4) The cheque for the aforesaid amount as well as
the receipt thereof are already placed on record.
5) Under such circumstances, the direction
appears to have been complied with. Accordingly, the
Contempt Petition stands disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
Komal Kamble Page| 2 of 2
Checking your session…