Bombay High Court

VITTHAL GIRJUBA GIRIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petitions are disposed as the contempt orders have been complied with.

Summary

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, disposed two connected petitions filed by Vitthal Girjuba Giri and Harihau Sandu Khadke against the State of Maharashtra and other officials. The petitions sought relief concerning orders of contempt. The Court observed that the related matters had already been resolved after the parties complied with the contempt orders. Consequently, the Court held that the contempt orders were satisfied. Both petitions were therefore dismissed as disposed.

Issues considered

Whether the orders of contempt in the petitions have been complied with
Whether the petitions should be dismissed on the basis of compliance

Subjects

contempt
compliance
petition disposal
high court
connected matters

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:44113-DB

                                                                910 & 911 cp 97-20 .




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                            BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                            910 CONT. PETITION NO. 97 OF 2020
                                     IN WP/511/2019

                                VITTHAL GIRJUBA GIRI
                                         VERSUS
                     THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                           …
          Mr. S. J. Salgare, AGP for Respondent-State
                                           ….
                                          AND
                        911 CONT. PETITION NO. 100 OF 2020
                                     IN WP/858/2019

                               HARIHAU SANDU KHADKE
                                         VERSUS
               UDAY CHAUDHARI THE COLLECTOR AURANGABAD AND
                                        ANOTHER
                                           …
          Mr. A. S. Salgare, AGP for Respondent-State
                                           ….
                                  CORAM       : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
                                                 VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                   Date        :   24/09/2026

          PER COURT :
          1.   None for the petitioners.
          2.   The connected matters have already been disposed of upon
          compliance. In view of the same, it appears that the orders under
          contempt in the present petitions have also been complied with.
          Accordingly, both the petitions stand disposed of.




          [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]                   [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE]
                      JUDGE                               JUDGE

                VS Maind/                                       Page|1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…