Bombay High Court
SAVITRIBAI PHULE MAGASVARGIYE MAHILA, SHIRSHAN PRASARAK MANAL THR. ITS PRESIDENTversusDR HARSHDEEP KAMBLE AND ORS.
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court held that there was no surviving ground for contempt and disposed of the petition.
Summary
The petitioner, Savitribai Phule Magasvargiye Mahila, filed a contempt petition against Dr. Harshdeep Kamble and others. The petitioner's counsel, Mr. Ajit V. Alange, informed the Court that he had received and reviewed the State's reply and concluded that no grounds for contempt remained. The Court accepted this statement and found that there was nothing left to pursue in the petition. Consequently, the Court ordered the contempt petition to be disposed of. No further orders or directions were made.
Issues considered
- What, if any, contempt of court remained after the State's reply?
Subjects
- contempt
- petition disposed
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-KOL:7689-DB
14.CP.97.2026.odt
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 97 OF 2026
Savitribai Phule Magasvargiye Mahila,
Shirshan Prasarak Manal
Through Its President ...Petitioner
Versus
Dr Harshdeep Kamble and Others ...Respondents
***
Mr. Ajit V. Alange, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. A. I. Patel, Addl. G.P. a/w Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP for the
Resettlement – State.
***
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL AND
ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATE : 18 AUGUST, 2026.
P. C. :
1. Mr. Alange, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,
states that he has received the reply of the State and has perused the
same and hence, accordingly, there is nothing surviving in the
contempt petition.
2. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for
the petitioner, the contempt petition is disposed of.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
Shrikant Malani Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…