Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHRIRAM BAHUUDHESHIYA SEVABHAVI SAMAJIK SANSTHA MOHA T THROUGH SECRETARY SACHIN SO GAUTAM MADAKEversusMR VIJAY WAGHMARE AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The contempt petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

Shriram Bahuudheshiya Sevabhavi Samajik Sanstha filed a contempt petition (WP/9131/2022) against Vijay Waghmare and others in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner, through its counsel, submitted a written instruction to withdraw the petition. The court recorded the withdrawal instruction and marked it for identification. Consequently, the bench disposed of the contempt petition as withdrawn. No merits of the contempt allegations were examined.

Subjects

  • contempt
  • petition withdrawal
  • high court
  • procedural disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39130-DB

                                                                  call paper CP 998 of 2023




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 998 OF 2023
                                      IN WP/9131/2022

                        Shriram Bahuudheshiya Sevabhavi Samajik Sanstha,
                        Moha, Through Its Secretary Sachin Gautam Madake
                                              Versus
                                   Vijay Waghmare And Others
                   __________________________________________________________
                   Adv. Nagesh Dalave h/f. Adv. Datta A. Madke for the
                   Petitioner
                   Mr. G. A. Kulkarni, AGP for State
                   __________________________________________________________

                                      CORAM     : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                  VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                      DATE      : AUGUST 28, 2026

                   PER COURT :

                   1)              Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.

                   2)              Learned Advocate Mr. Dalave, holding for Mr.

                   Madke, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits copy of

                   the written instructions issued by the petitioner for

                   withdrawal of the petition. The same is taken on record and

                   marked "X" for identification.

                   3)              In view of the same, Contempt Petition stands

                   disposed of as withdrawn.



                   (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)            (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                             JUDGE                            JUDGE

                    Komal Kamble                                             Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.