Bombay High Court
SOU CHHAYA ASHOK KHEWOOR AND ORSversusRAJIV RAJARAM CHAWANDE AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
A civil revision application must be dismissed if the applicant's counsel lacks instructions to prosecute it.
Summary
The applicants, Swapnil Chhaya Ashok Khewoor and others, filed a civil revision application (No. 129 of 2020) before the High Court of Bombay challenging a decree. The applicants' counsel, Mr. Muralidharan Kalathil, appeared before the Court and informed that he had received no instructions from the applicants to pursue the revision. Consequently, the Court was asked to consider whether the revision should proceed in the absence of any direction from the parties. The Court held that a civil revision cannot be pursued without the active instruction of the parties. Accordingly, the revision application was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when the applicant's counsel has no instructions to proceed with a civil revision application?
Subjects
- civil revision
- non‑prosecution
- procedural law
- court order
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:38906
35-CRA-129-2020.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 129 OF 2020
Swapnil
Chhaya Ashok Khewoor and Ors. …Applicants
Vs.
Rajiv Rajaram Chawande and Anr. …Respondents
Mr. Muralidharan Kalathil i/b. Mr. P. G. Lad for the applicants.
Adv. Pavitra Manesh i/b. Mr. M. S. Topkar for respondent
no.1.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER 2026
ORDER :
1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has
no instructions to proceed with the civil revision application.
2. The civil revision application is dismissed for
non-prosecution.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
1/1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.