Bombay High Court
SHRI. RAMESH MANNALAL LUNAWATversusANANT (ANANDA) PANDHARINATH GAWANDE AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The civil revision application is dismissed as infructuous because the main appeal has already been disposed of.
Summary
The applicant, Swapnil Ramesh Mannalal Lunawat, filed a civil revision application (No. 162 of 2020) before the High Court of Bombay challenging the orders of the lower court. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Digvijay A. Patil, submitted that the main appeal in the matter had already been disposed of, rendering the revision application moot. The court considered whether a revision could proceed when the principal appeal was concluded. Finding that there was no substantive ground for the revision as the primary dispute was already settled, the court held the application to be infructuous. Consequently, the revision application was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether a civil revision application is maintainable when the main appeal has already been disposed of
Subjects
- civil revision
- infructuous
- appeal disposed
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:38908
38-CRA-162-2020.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 162 OF 2020
Swapnil
Ramesh Mannalal Lunawat. …Applicant
Vs.
Anant (ananda) Pandharinath Gawande
and Ors. …Respondents
Mr. Digvijay A. Patil i/b. Mr. Anilkumar Patil for the applicant.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER 2026
ORDER :
1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the main
appeal has been disposed of rendering this civil revision
application infructuous.
2. The civil revision application is disposed of as
infructuous.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
1/1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.