Bombay High Court
SHRI. VILAS SHANKARRAO PINGALEversusSMT. SHEELA ANANT KHOPPIKAR AND ANR.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The consent terms are legal and valid, and the civil revision application is disposed of per those terms.
Summary
The applicant and respondents entered into a consent agreement dated 6 October 2026 concerning the surrender of tenancy, payment of consideration, and transfer of possession of the suit premises. Both parties, represented by their counsel, confirmed the signatures and the receipt of consideration. The court examined the consent terms, found them to be legal and valid, and recorded them as exhibit X‑1. Consequently, the civil revision application filed by the applicant was disposed of in accordance with the consent terms. No further orders were made beyond the acknowledgment of the settlement.
Issues considered
- Whether the consent terms dated 6 October 2026 are valid and can be recorded as the basis for disposing the civil revision application
Subjects
- consent decree
- surrender of tenancy
- civil revision
- settlement
- possession
- consideration
Judgment
32-cra-226-2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
varsha
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 226 OF 2019
Shri Vilas Shankarrao Pingale … Applicant
vs.
Smt. Sheela Anant Khoppikar and Anr … Respondents
Mr. S.A. Rajeshirke for the Applicant.
Mr. B.M. Patwardhan for the Respondent.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATED : 6th OCTOBER 2026
ORDER:
1. Learned counsels for the parties have tendered the consent
Digitally
terms dated 6th October 2026. The consent terms is signed by the
signed by
VARSHA
VARSHA VIJAY
VIJAY RAJGURU
RAJGURU Date:
2026.10.06
applicant and both the respondents as well as their respective
21:06:50
+0530
advocates. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the
applicant’s son who is power of attorney holder, is present in the
court. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that both the
respondents have signed the consent terms in his presence. He
further submits that respondent no.2 was present in the court today.
However, she had to leave the court. He identifies the signatures of
the respondents.
Page no. 1 of 2
32-cra-226-2019.doc
2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the consideration
amount towards surrender of tenancy is already paid to the
respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents confirmed the
receipt of the consideration. Learned counsel for the applicant on
instructions confirmed that the physical possession of the suit
premises is already handed over to the applicant on 11 th September
2026 in view of the surrender of tenancy and payment of
consideration amount.
3. The consent terms dated 6th October 2026 is taken on record
and marked ‘X-1’ with today’s date for identification. Learned
counsels for the respective parties identify the signatures and
confirm the correctness of the terms and conditions recorded in the
consent terms. They submit that they have signed the consent
terms for confirmation of the correctness of the terms and conditions
and the signatures of the parties.
4. I have perused the consent terms. The terms are legal and
valid.
5. The civil revision application is disposed of in terms of the
consent terms.
(GAURI GODSE, J.)
Page no. 2 of 2
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.