Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHRI. VILAS SHANKARRAO PINGALEversusSMT. SHEELA ANANT KHOPPIKAR AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The consent terms are legal and valid, and the civil revision application is disposed of per those terms.

Summary

The applicant and respondents entered into a consent agreement dated 6 October 2026 concerning the surrender of tenancy, payment of consideration, and transfer of possession of the suit premises. Both parties, represented by their counsel, confirmed the signatures and the receipt of consideration. The court examined the consent terms, found them to be legal and valid, and recorded them as exhibit X‑1. Consequently, the civil revision application filed by the applicant was disposed of in accordance with the consent terms. No further orders were made beyond the acknowledgment of the settlement.

Issues considered

  • Whether the consent terms dated 6 October 2026 are valid and can be recorded as the basis for disposing the civil revision application

Subjects

  • consent decree
  • surrender of tenancy
  • civil revision
  • settlement
  • possession
  • consideration

Judgment

                                                                    32-cra-226-2019.doc




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
           varsha
                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                             CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 226 OF 2019


                     Shri Vilas Shankarrao Pingale                   … Applicant
                                vs.
                     Smt. Sheela Anant Khoppikar and Anr             … Respondents


                     Mr. S.A. Rajeshirke for the Applicant.
                     Mr. B.M. Patwardhan for the Respondent.


                                                     CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
                                                     DATED : 6th OCTOBER 2026


                     ORDER:

                     1.    Learned counsels for the parties have tendered the consent

        Digitally
                     terms dated 6th October 2026. The consent terms is signed by the
        signed by
        VARSHA
VARSHA VIJAY
VIJAY   RAJGURU
RAJGURU Date:
        2026.10.06
                     applicant and both the respondents as well as their respective
        21:06:50
        +0530


                     advocates. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the

                     applicant’s son who is power of attorney holder, is present in the

                     court. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that both the

                     respondents have signed the consent terms in his presence. He

                     further submits that respondent no.2 was present in the court today.

                     However, she had to leave the court. He identifies the signatures of

                     the respondents.

                                                  Page no. 1 of 2
                                                  32-cra-226-2019.doc



2.       Learned counsels for the parties submit that the consideration

amount towards surrender of tenancy is already paid to the

respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents confirmed the

receipt of the consideration. Learned counsel for the applicant on

instructions confirmed that the physical possession of the suit

premises is already handed over to the applicant on 11 th September

2026 in view of the surrender of tenancy and payment of

consideration amount.

3.       The consent terms dated 6th October 2026 is taken on record

and marked ‘X-1’ with today’s date for identification. Learned

counsels for the respective parties identify the signatures and

confirm the correctness of the terms and conditions recorded in the

consent terms. They submit that they have signed the consent

terms for confirmation of the correctness of the terms and conditions

and the signatures of the parties.

4.       I have perused the consent terms. The terms are legal and

valid.

5.       The civil revision application is disposed of in terms of the

consent terms.



                                                  (GAURI GODSE, J.)

                               Page no. 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.