Bombay High Court
SATISHKUMAR DAHYALAL CHOKSIversusSHRI MAULIK GIRISH DAMANIA AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The civil revision application is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The applicant, Swapnil Satishkumar Dahyalal Choksi, filed a civil revision application (No. 378 of 2018) before the High Court of Bombay. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, and the respondent side was represented by Ms. Ranjana Parikh. The court noted the applicant's failure to appear and prosecute the application. The issue before the court was whether the revision application could be dismissed for non‑prosecution. The judge held that the lack of appearance amounted to non‑prosecution and dismissed the application. Consequently, the civil revision was dismissed, leaving the status quo unchanged.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when a party fails to appear and prosecute a civil revision application?
Subjects
- civil revision
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- procedural default
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:40248
15-CRA-378-2018.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 378 OF 2018
Swapnil
Satishkumar Dahyalal Choksi …Applicant
Vs.
Maulik Girish Damania and Ors. …Respondents
None for the Applicant.
Ms. Ranjana Parikh for respondent nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 30th SEPTEMBER 2026
ORDER :
1. None appears for the applicant.
2. The civil revision application is dismissed for
non-prosecution.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
1/1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.