Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MACROTECH DEVELOPERS LIMITEDversusSAINT ANDREWS CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD, THR. AUTHORISED MR. PAWAN KUMAR GOYAL AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

A court may amend its own order to rectify clerical and typographical errors without affecting the substantive adjudication.

Summary

The High Court of Bombay entertained a praecipe filed on 28 September 2026 seeking correction of clerical errors in its earlier order dated 17 September 2026 in Civil Revision Application No.442 of 2023. The applicant, Macrotech Developers Limited, through Advocate Ms. Rashmi Dhongde, pointed out two specific mistakes: an incorrect date ‘04.12.2023’ and an erroneous reference to ‘District Jude, Nashik’. The Court examined the praecipe, confirmed that the errors were purely typographical and did not affect the substantive rights of the parties. It directed that the date be corrected to ‘04.01.2023’ and the reference changed to ‘Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune’. The corrected order was to be uploaded and the praecipe was thereafter disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a court may correct clerical and typographical errors in its own order through a praecipe?

Subjects

  • correction of order
  • praecipe
  • civil revision
  • clerical error

Judgment

                                                                  P3.CRA.442.2023.doc

Ajay

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                            CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                  CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.442 OF 2023

       Macrotech Developers Limited                  .. Applicant
             Versus
       Saint Andrews Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. and
       Anr.                                          .. Respondents

                                ....................
        Ms. Rashmi Dhongde, Advocate for Applicant.
                                      ......…........…

                                         CORAM           : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                         DATE            : SEPTEMBER 28, 2026.

       P.C.:

       1.        Not on Board. Mentioned by way of filing praecipe dated

       28.09.2026. Perused the praecipe.


       2.        Heard Ms. Dhongde, learned Advocate for Applicant.


       3.        Perused the praecipe which is filed for speaking to the

       minutes of order dated 17.09.2026. In the said order, following

       corrections are to be made:-


                 (i) On page No.18, 7th line of paragraph No.18, the date
                      ‘04.12.2023’ be replaced with the date ‘04.01.2023’;
                      and

                 (ii) On page No.18, second last line of paragraph No.20, the
                      words ‘District Jude, Nashik’ be replaced with the words
                      ‘Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune’.



                                                                               1 of 2
                                                                                      P3.CRA.442.2023.doc


                                  4.       Necessary corrections be carried out in the original order

                                  dated 17.09.2026 and corrected order be uploaded.

                                  5.       Praecipe is disposed.


                                                                         [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

        Ajay
               Digitally signed
               by AJAY
AJAY       TRAMBAK
TRAMBAK    UGALMUGALE
UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.09.28
               17:37:28 +0530




                                                                                                   2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.