Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

JOANA JADHAV @ SHAKUNTALA PREMCHAND JADHAVversusR.T. REV. BISHOP PRAKASH DINKAR PATOLE AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

A civil revision application may be dismissed for non-prosecution when the applicant does not appear for the hearing.

Summary

Joana Jadhav (applicant) filed a civil revision application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant failed to appear on the scheduled hearing date, leading the court to grant a final adjournment. On the adjourned date, the applicant again failed to appear. The court noted the repeated non-appearance as a lack of prosecution of the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the civil revision application for non-prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Gauri Godse on 2 September 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a civil revision application should be dismissed for non-prosecution when the applicant fails to appear for hearing

Subjects

  • civil procedure
  • revision
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • failure to appear

Judgment

                                                                       20-cra-482-2017.doc




          varsha
                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                            CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 482 OF 2017


                     Joana Jadhav @ Shakuntala Premchand … Applicant
                     Jadhav
                                vs.
                     R.T. Rev. Bishop Prakash Dinkar Patole and        … Respondents
                     Ors


                     None for the Applicant.

        Digitally
        signed by
        VARSHA
                                                    CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
VARSHA VIJAY
VIJAY   RAJGURU
RAJGURU Date:
        2026.09.03
        14:10:54
                                                     DATED : 2nd SEPTEMBER 2026
        +0530




                     ORDER:

                     1.    None had appeared for the applicant on the last date, hence,

                     the application was adjourned as a last chance.

                     2.    Even today, none appears for the applicant.

                     3.    The civil revision application is dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                                                       (GAURI GODSE, J.)




                                                  Page no. 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.