Bombay High Court
JOANA JADHAV @ SHAKUNTALA PREMCHAND JADHAVversusR.T. REV. BISHOP PRAKASH DINKAR PATOLE AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
A civil revision application may be dismissed for non-prosecution when the applicant does not appear for the hearing.
Summary
Joana Jadhav (applicant) filed a civil revision application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant failed to appear on the scheduled hearing date, leading the court to grant a final adjournment. On the adjourned date, the applicant again failed to appear. The court noted the repeated non-appearance as a lack of prosecution of the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the civil revision application for non-prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Gauri Godse on 2 September 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a civil revision application should be dismissed for non-prosecution when the applicant fails to appear for hearing
Subjects
- civil procedure
- revision
- non-prosecution
- dismissal
- failure to appear
Judgment
20-cra-482-2017.doc
varsha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 482 OF 2017
Joana Jadhav @ Shakuntala Premchand … Applicant
Jadhav
vs.
R.T. Rev. Bishop Prakash Dinkar Patole and … Respondents
Ors
None for the Applicant.
Digitally
signed by
VARSHA
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
VARSHA VIJAY
VIJAY RAJGURU
RAJGURU Date:
2026.09.03
14:10:54
DATED : 2nd SEPTEMBER 2026
+0530
ORDER:
1. None had appeared for the applicant on the last date, hence,
the application was adjourned as a last chance.
2. Even today, none appears for the applicant.
3. The civil revision application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(GAURI GODSE, J.)
Page no. 1 of 1
Checking your session…