Bombay High Court

MR. KERSI JIMMY ENGINEERversusTHE TRUSEES OF PARSI PUNCHAYET FUNDS AND PRPERTIES AND ORS.

Decided: 7 October 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The court accepted the consent terms and disposed of the civil revision application and all pending applications as infructuous.

Summary

The applicants, Swapnil Kersi Jimmy Engineer and Anr., filed a civil revision application (No. 511 of 2012) before the Bombay High Court against the Trustees of Parsi Punchayet Funds and Properties and others. Both parties, through their counsel, submitted consent terms dated 7 October 2026, which were signed by the parties and their advocates and verified in court. The court examined the consent terms, found them legal and valid, and accepted the undertakings therein. Consequently, the court disposed of the civil revision application in accordance with the consent terms. All other pending applications were also declared infructuous and disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether the civil revision application should be disposed of based on the parties' consent terms

Subjects

civil revision
consent order
infructuous
High Court of Bombay
application disposal

Judgment

                                                         4-CRA-511-2012.docx


               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 511 OF 2012
Swapnil
          Kersi Jimmy Engineer and Anr.                  …Applicants
               Vs.
          The Trusees Of Parsi Punchayet
          Funds and Prperties and Ors.                   …Respondents
                                        WITH
                      CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 586 OF 2012

                                        WITH
                      CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 633 OF 2012

          Mr. Harshad M. Deshpande for the applicants.
          Mr. Agnel Carneiro a/w. Mr. Smith Barboz i/b. Mulla and
          Mulla and Craigie Blunt & Caroe for the responents.

                                 CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.

                                 DATE :       7th OCTOBER 2026

          ORDER :


          1.    Learned counsels for the respective parties have

          tendered consent terms dated 7th October 2026.


          2.    The consent terms is signed by the applicants and the

          constituted attorney of respondent nos. 1 to 8. The consent

          terms is also signed by the respective advocates. The

          signatories are present in the court and they are identified by

          their respective advocates. The signatories confirmed their

                                        1/2
                                               4-CRA-511-2012.docx


signatures and the terms and conditions in the consent terms

to be true and correct.


3.    Consent terms dated 7th October 2026 is taken on

record and marked ‘X1’ with today’s date for identification.


4.    I have perused the consent terms. The terms are legal

and valid. The assurances and the undertakings in the

consent terms are accepted as undertakings to this court.


5.    The civil revision application is disposed of in terms of

the consent terms.


6.    All the pending applications are disposed of as

infructuous.




                                          [GAURI GODSE, J.]




                              2/2

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

Harshad M Deshpande