Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHRI.SANTAJI MANSING KARANDEversusSMT.KALAVATI PANDHARINATH SOMVANSHI

Disposal
ABATED

Holding

The death of a sole respondent results in the abatement of the civil proceedings, leading to disposal of the application.

Summary

The applicant, Shri Santaji Mansing Karande, filed a civil revision (No. 670 of 2011) against Smt. Kalavati Pandharinath Somvanshi. During the proceedings, counsel for the sole respondent informed the court that the respondent had died and filed a pursis under Order XXII Rule 10A of the CPC. The court noted that the death of the sole respondent caused the suit to abate under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure. Consequently, the court directed the parties to take steps in furtherance of the respondent's death and stood the matter over. Ultimately, the court disposed of the revision application as abated, concluding that no further adjudication was possible.

Issues considered

  • What is the effect of the death of a sole respondent on pending civil proceedings?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • civil procedure
  • abeyance
  • death of party
  • revision
  • order xxii rule 10a

Judgment

                                                                     61-Cra-670-2011.docx


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

              CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 670 OF 2011

Shri. Santaji Mansing Karande                             … Applicant
                     Versus
Smt. Kalavati Pandharinath Somvanshi                      … Respondent


                                ——————
Mr. Dilip Bodake a/w. Mr. Amar Dhumal, Mr. Viraj Dhumal & Mr. Pruthviraj
Dagade for the Applicant.
Mr. Arjun A. Mohite i/b. Mr. Kirankumar Phakade for the Respondent.
                                ——————

                                   Coram :         ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

                                   Date      :     17th August 2026.

PER COURT :


1.    On 12th June 2026, the following order was passed :


      “1.     Learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent submits
              that   the      respondent     has     expired.   He     seeks   some
              accommodation.

      2.      Learned counsel for the respondent is therefore directed to
              file a pursis on record informing the exact date of death of
              the respondent.




osk                                 1 of 2
                                                                                   61-Cra-670-2011.docx


                              3.     In the meanwhile, the appellant is also directed to take
                                     steps in furtherance of the death of the sole respondent.

                              4.     Stand over to 24/07/2026.”




                    2.        Record indicates that, on 12th June 2026, Mr. Kirankumar Phakade,

                    learned Advocate for the sole Respondent, has discharged his duties under

                    Order XXII Rule 10A of the Code of Civil Procedure.


                    3.        In view of the death of the sole Respondent, the proceedings stand

                    abated.


                    4.        The Civil Revision Application No. 670 of 2011 is accordingly disposed

                    of as abated.




                                                            [ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ]

           Digitally signed
           by OMKAR
           SHIVAHAR
OMKAR      KUMBHAKARN
SHIVAHAR
KUMBHAKARN Date:
           2026.08.17
           20:06:51
           +0530




                    osk                                 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.