Bombay High Court
DEEPLAXMI NAGARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA LTD.versusVAISHALI ARUN REBINAL AND ORS.
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The revision application is withdrawn, and the matter is left to be adjudicated by the trial court.
Summary
Deeplaxmi Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd filed a civil revision (No. 92 of 2026) in the Bombay High Court seeking to quash the judgment and order dated 27-04-2026 passed by the 7th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Satara in Regular Civil Suit No. 68 of 2026. The applicant, through counsel, later requested leave to withdraw the revision application and to raise all contentions before the trial court. The bench, after hearing, granted the request to withdraw the revision and directed that the merits be considered by the trial court. Consequently, the revision application was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original dispute were decided by the High Court.
Issues considered
- Whether a civil revision application may be withdrawn at the discretion of the applicant and with the court's permission
- Procedural consequences of withdrawing a revision application on the merits of the underlying suit
Subjects
- civil revision
- withdrawal of application
- procedural law
- High Court
- trial court
Judgment
30-CRA-92-2026 (C).docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 92 OF 2026
Deeplaxmi Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. … Applicant
Versus
Mrs. Vaishali Arun Rebinal And Ors. … Respondents
——————
Mr. Pradeep D. Dalvi a/w. Mr. Tejas Shelake & Ms. Sonal Nalawade for the
Applicant.
——————
Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
Date : 10th September 2026.
PER COURT :
1. By the present Revision Application, the Applicant has sought the
following substantive relief:
“A] The impugned judgement and order dated 27-4-2026 passed by
7th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Satara passed below Exh.
20 in Regular Civil Suit No. 68 of 2026 be quashed and set aside
and application below Exh. 20 may be allowed.”
2. After having heard the matter for some time, Mr. Pradeep Dalvi,
learned advocate for the Applicant, sought a pass over to take instructions. At
osk 1 of 2
30-CRA-92-2026 (C).docx
his request, after some time, this Application was taken up.
3. Mr. Pradeep Dalvi, learned advocate for the Applicant, on instructions
from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present Revision Application
with liberty to raise all the contentions on law as well as on merits of the case
before the Trial Court.
4. In view of the statement made by Mr. Pradeep Dalvi, learned Advocate
for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the Revision Application.
5. All the contentions of the Applicant on merits of the case are left open
for consideration by the Trial Court while adjudicating the suit.
6. Civil Revision Application No. 92 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn.
[ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ]
Digitally signed
by OMKAR
SHIVAHAR
OMKAR KUMBHAKARN
SHIVAHAR
KUMBHAKARN Date:
2026.09.10
20:54:56
+0530
osk 2 of 2
Checking your session…