Bombay High Court
LOKHANDWALA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTDversusWALTER THOMAS QUINNY
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The registration of a Deed of Cancellation extinguishes the cause of action, warranting disposal of the execution application.
Summary
Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. filed an execution application against Walter Thomas Quinny. The applicant argued that a Deed of Cancellation had been registered by the Prothonotary & Senior Master on 15 May 2026, extinguishing any enforceable right. Consequently, the applicant contended that there was nothing left to execute and the application should be dismissed. The learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Anil Rao, reiterated this position before the Court. The Court, after considering the submission, held that the registration of the deed of cancellation indeed nullified the basis of the execution proceeding and ordered the application to be disposed of.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of a registered Deed of Cancellation on pending execution proceedings?
Subjects
- execution
- deed of cancellation
- registration
- disposal
- civil procedure
Judgment
3. EXA 1191-25.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1191 OF 2025
Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. ...Applicant
Vs.
Walter Thomas Quinny ...Respondent
Mr. Anil Rao with Mr. Deu Mistry i/b Yna Legal LLP for the Applicant.
CORAM : ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE : 21st AUGUST, 2026
P.C. :
1. Mr. Rao, learned Counsel appears for the Execution Applicant
and submits that since the Deed of Cancellation has already been
registered by the Prothonotary & Senior Master on 15 th May, 2026,
nothing survives in this Execution Application and that the Execution
Application be disposed of.
2. The Execution Application to accordingly stand disposed of.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
Digitally
signed by
NIKITA
NIKITA YOGESH
YOGESH GADGIL
GADGIL Date:
2026.08.21
20:18:37 Nikita Gadgil 1/1
+0530
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.