Bombay High Court
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, OSMANABADversusGANPATI KRISHNA JADHAV AND ORS
- Disposal
- PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
Holding
The Court partially allowed the appeal and cross‑objection, modifying the award to include interest under Sections 28 and 34 of the Land Acquisition Act while confirming the rest of the judgment.
Summary
The case concerns a land acquisition award dated 15 July 2014 in Osmanabad, which was appealed by the acquiring body (Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division) and cross‑objected by the claimants (Ganpati Krishna Jadhav et al.). The High Court noted that the controversy is identical to that decided in First Appeal No. 4399 of 2017, where the Court had partially allowed the appeals and directed that interest be awarded under Sections 28 and 34 of the Land Acquisition Act. Relying on that precedent and the Full Bench decision in State of Maharashtra v. Kailash Shiva Rangari, the Court partially allowed the present appeal and cross‑objection, modified the award to include interest, upheld the enhanced compensation, and confirmed the remaining portions of the original judgment. The claimants were also permitted to withdraw the amount deposited with accrued interest, and any pending civil applications were disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the claimants are entitled to interest on compensation under Sections 28 and 34 of the Land Acquisition Act.
- Whether the earlier order in First Appeal No. 4399 of 2017 governs the present appeal and cross‑objection.
- Whether the award dated 15 July 2014 should be modified to incorporate interest while confirming the enhanced compensation.
Legislation cited
- Land Acquisition Act — s. 28, 34
Subjects
- land acquisition
- compensation
- interest
- modification of award
- civil appeal
- cross objection
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41300
910-FA-1139-2017.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
910 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1139 OF 2017
Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Osmanabad and Others
VERSUS
Ganpati Krishna Jadhav And Others
AND
X-OBJECTION NO. 80 OF 2025 IN FA/1139/2017
Ganpati Krishna Jadhav And Others
VERSUS
Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Osmanabad and Another
……
Mr. S.G. Sangle, Advocate for Appellant in FA/1139/2017 and for
Respondent No.1 in X-Obj./80/2025
Mr. M.B. Kolpe, Advocate for Applicant-Claimants in in X-Obj./80/2025 and
for Respondents No.1 to 3 in FA/1139/2017
Mr. A.D. Wange, AGP for State
……
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 04 SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.
2. This First Appeal and Cross Objection arise out of the Judgment and
Award dated 15.07.2014 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division,
Osmanabad, in Land Acquisition Reference No.78 of 2014.
3. Learned counsel Mr. Sangle for the appellant-Acquiring Body and
learned counsel Mr. Kolpe for the claimant submit that the controversy
involved in the present matter is squarely covered by the order dated
28.07.2026 passed by this Court in First Appeal No.4399 of 2017 and
connected matters, whereby this Court partly allowed the appeals preferred
910-FA-1139-2017.odt
2
by the Acquiring Body. They, therefore, submit that the present First Appeal
and Cross Objection may also be disposed of in terms of the said order.
Learned AGP fairly concedes the aforesaid position.
4. Having considered the submissions advanced by learned counsel for
the respective parties, and in view of the admitted position that the
controversy involved in the present matter is identical to the one decided by
this Court in First Appeal No.4399 of 2017 and connected matters vide
order dated 28.07.2026, whereby this Court partly allowed the appeals and
modified the impugned Awards to the extent of the interest part, I see no
reason to take a different view. Consequently, the First Appeal filed by the
Acquiring Body as well as the Cross Objection filed by the claimant deserve
to be disposed of in terms of the said order. Hence, the following order:
ORDER
(i) The First Appeal and Cross X-objection are partly allowed.
(ii) The impugned judgment and award dated 15.07.2014 passed by the
learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad in Land Acquisition
Reference No.78 of 2014 is modified.
(iii) Claimants shall be entitled to interest under Sections 28 and 34 of
the Land Acquisition Act, in terms of the law laid down by the Full Bench of
this Court in State of Maharashtra v. Kailash Shiva Rangari, 2016 (3),
Mh.L.J. 457.
910-FA-1139-2017.odt
3
(iv) The enhancement of compensation awarded by the learned
Reference Court is maintained.
(v) The remaining part of the impugned judgment and award is
confirmed.
(vii) The claimants are permitted to withdraw the amount ling deposited
in this Court, along with accrued interest, if any, in accordance with law.
(viii) Pending Civil Applications, if any, stand disposed of.
[ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
JUDGE
S P Rane
Checking your session…