Bombay High Court
SMT. RAZIA BEGAM AZAM SAYYAD THROUGH HER C.A. SMT SAYYED SHABINA BANO AZAMversusM/S ANTHONY MOTOR GARAGE AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
Satish Ramchandra Sangar appealed against M/s Anthony Motor Garage and another for an enhancement in an injury claim. The court noted that a notice had been served on the appellant and the matter was already slated for dismissal. The appellant failed to prosecute the appeal. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal for non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the injury claim were considered.
Issues considered
- Whether the appeal for enhancement of the injury claim should be entertained despite non‑prosecution
Subjects
- injury claim
- appeal dismissal
- non‑prosecution
- civil procedure
Judgment
32-FA-1164-2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SATISH
RAMCHANDRA FIRST APPEAL NO.1164 OF 2014
SANGAR
Digitally signed by
SATISH RAMCHANDRA
SANGAR Smt.Razia Begam Azam Sayyad,
Date: 2026.08.27
11:58:34 +0530 through her Constituted Attorney,
Smt.Sayyed Shabina Bano Azam ...Appellant
V/s.
M/s Anthony Motor Garage and Anr. ...Respondents
*****
No one is present:- On behalf of the Appellant.
Ms.Poonam Mittal:- Advocate for Respondent No.2–
Insurance Company.
*****
CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J.
DATE : 24th AUGUST 2026
P. C. :-
1. The notice on the sole Appellant is served. The matter is already
kept for dismissal. This is an Appeal by the Claimant for enhancement
in an injury claim.
2. For non–prosecution, the Appeal is dismissed.
[S. M. MODAK, J.]
Satish Sangar 1/1
Checking your session…