Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SMT. RAZIA BEGAM AZAM SAYYAD THROUGH HER C.A. SMT SAYYED SHABINA BANO AZAMversusM/S ANTHONY MOTOR GARAGE AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The appeal is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Satish Ramchandra Sangar appealed against M/s Anthony Motor Garage and another for an enhancement in an injury claim. The court noted that a notice had been served on the appellant and the matter was already slated for dismissal. The appellant failed to prosecute the appeal. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal for non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the injury claim were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether the appeal for enhancement of the injury claim should be entertained despite non‑prosecution

Subjects

  • injury claim
  • appeal dismissal
  • non‑prosecution
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                                              32-FA-1164-2014.doc


                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

SATISH
RAMCHANDRA                              FIRST APPEAL NO.1164 OF 2014
SANGAR
Digitally signed by
SATISH RAMCHANDRA
SANGAR                Smt.Razia Begam Azam Sayyad,
Date: 2026.08.27
11:58:34 +0530        through her Constituted Attorney,
                      Smt.Sayyed Shabina Bano Azam                           ...Appellant

                             V/s.
                      M/s Anthony Motor Garage and Anr.                      ...Respondents

                                                       *****

                      No one is present:-                 On behalf of the Appellant.
                      Ms.Poonam Mittal:-                  Advocate for Respondent No.2–
                                                          Insurance Company.

                                                       *****
                                              CORAM       :     S. M. MODAK, J.
                                              DATE        :     24th AUGUST 2026
                      P. C. :-

                      1.     The notice on the sole Appellant is served. The matter is already

                      kept for dismissal. This is an Appeal by the Claimant for enhancement

                      in an injury claim.

                      2.     For non–prosecution, the Appeal is dismissed.


                                                          [S. M. MODAK, J.]




                      Satish Sangar                                                            1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.