Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHRI. SURESH KISHAN NAGANEversusSHRI. SUDHAKAR DWARKANATH MAHANT AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The appeal is disposed as the parties have entered into consent terms settling the dispute.

Summary

Shri Suresh Kishan Nagane appealed before the Bombay High Court against Shri Sudhakar Dwarkanath Mahant and several other respondents. During the hearing, the parties executed consent terms that settled the dispute, with the appellant expressly renouncing any claim against respondents No. 1, 2 and No. 4‑8. The consent terms were placed on record and identified as document ‘X’. The court, noting the settlement, disposed of the first appeal and any pending interim applications without awarding costs. No substantive legal questions were adjudicated as the matter was resolved by mutual agreement.

Subjects

  • consent decree
  • settlement
  • civil appeal
  • disposal
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                      501-FA-1202-2025.DOC



              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                        FIRST APPEAL NO. 1202 OF 2025

Shri Suresh Kishan Nagane                                        ...Appellant(s)

         Versus

Shri Sudhakar Dwarkanath Mahant and others                       ...Respondent(s)
                               _______

Mr. Nikit Jhunjhunwala, Mr. Ameet Mehta, Ms. Prathima Soundalkar, Jill Rathod
i/b M/s Solicis Lex, Advocates for the Appellant.
Adv. Dishang Shah, for Respondent No. 3.
Mr. Kamlesh Khandor, Partner of R.K.E. Builder and Developer (Partner of R.No.
3)
Mr. Suresh Nagane (in person).
                                       _______

                      CORAM:                 AARTI SATHE, J.

                      DATE:                  08th SEPTEMBER, 2026

P.C.

1.       Learned counsel appearing for the parties have tendered the consent terms

whereby the dispute in the present First Appeal is settled. These consent terms

have been entered into between the Appellant and Respondent No. 3 and have

been signed by the Appellant’s and the Respondent No. 3’s representatives and

also identified by their respective advocates. The parties are also present in Court.

2.       In Paragraph 7 of the consent terms, it has been categorically recorded that

the Appellant does not have any claim of any nature whatsoever against the other

Respondents i.e. Respondent No. 1, 2 and Respondent Nos. 4 to 8.

3.       The copy of the consent terms is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for


                                    Page 1 of 2
Tiwari
                                                                  501-FA-1202-2025.DOC



identification.

4.       The First Appeal is disposed of in view of the aforesaid consent terms.

Interim Applications, if any, also stand disposed of. No costs.




                                                 (AARTI SATHE, J.)




                                   Page 2 of 2
Tiwari


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.