Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAMRAO MANIKRAO BIRADAR AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposal
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Holding

The court held that the typographical error can be cured by substituting the correct words and directing the corrected copy to be uploaded.

Summary

The appellants filed a motion seeking correction of a typographical error in Clause V of paragraph 10 of the order dated 19.08.2026. The error involved the words "appellants/claimants" which should have read "respondent – Acquiring Body". The court examined the request and determined that such a correction is permissible to reflect the intended parties accurately. It ordered that the erroneous words be substituted with the correct phrasing. The corrected copy of the order is to be uploaded. Consequently, the motion was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether a typographical error in a court order can be corrected by amendment without a fresh hearing?

Subjects

  • court order correction
  • typographical error
  • procedural amendment
  • appeal
  • minutes

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:37939
                This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //



                                                          (1)                      FA 1530 OF 2020


                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   930 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1530 OF 2020

                                RAMRAO MANIKRAO BIRADAR AND ANR
                                              VERSUS
                                THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

                                                  WITH
                                      FIRST APPEAL NO. 1533 OF 2020

                                  MOHAN TATYARAO SURYAWANSHI
                                              VERSUS
                                THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

                                                  WITH
                                      FIRST APPEAL NO. 1531 OF 2020

                                  CHANDRAKANT MANIK BIRADAR
                                              VERSUS
                              THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
                                                  …
           Mr. V. G. Sakolkar, Advocate for Appellants/Claimants
                                                  …

                                                    CORAM         : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
                                                    DATE          : 24.08.2026

           PER COURT :-

           .             Motion for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 19.08.2026

           is moved by the appellants thereby indicating typographical error at Clause V

           of paragraph 10.
      This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //



                                                (2)                          FA 1530 OF 2020


2.             The typographical error is cured by substituting the words

“respondent – Acquiring Body” instead of appellants/claimants.


3.             Corrections be carried out and corrected copy be uploaded.


4.             Motion stands disposed of.




                                                                  [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.]
PRW


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.