Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

CHANDRAKANT MANIK BIRADARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposal
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Holding

The court may correct a clerical or typographical error in its own order by issuing a speaking to minutes order.

Summary

The appellants filed a motion to speak to the minutes of the order dated 19.08.2026, alleging a typographical error in Clause V of paragraph 10 where the words "appellants/claimants" were used. They sought substitution of the phrase "respondent – Acquiring Body" in place of the erroneous wording. The Bench examined the motion and held that such clerical mistakes can be rectified by the court. Accordingly, the court ordered the correction to be made and directed that the corrected copy be uploaded. The motion was thereafter disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether a typographical error in the minutes of a court order can be corrected by the court?

Subjects

  • Typographical error
  • Correction of order
  • Speaking to minutes
  • High Court
  • Civil Procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:37940
                This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //



                                                          (1)                      FA 1530 OF 2020


                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   930 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1530 OF 2020

                                RAMRAO MANIKRAO BIRADAR AND ANR
                                              VERSUS
                                THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

                                                  WITH
                                      FIRST APPEAL NO. 1533 OF 2020

                                  MOHAN TATYARAO SURYAWANSHI
                                              VERSUS
                                THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

                                                  WITH
                                      FIRST APPEAL NO. 1531 OF 2020

                                  CHANDRAKANT MANIK BIRADAR
                                              VERSUS
                              THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
                                                  …
           Mr. V. G. Sakolkar, Advocate for Appellants/Claimants
                                                  …

                                                    CORAM         : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
                                                    DATE          : 24.08.2026

           PER COURT :-

           .             Motion for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 19.08.2026

           is moved by the appellants thereby indicating typographical error at Clause V

           of paragraph 10.
      This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //



                                                (2)                          FA 1530 OF 2020


2.             The typographical error is cured by substituting the words

“respondent – Acquiring Body” instead of appellants/claimants.


3.             Corrections be carried out and corrected copy be uploaded.


4.             Motion stands disposed of.




                                                                  [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.]
PRW


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.