Bombay High Court
MOHAN TATYARAO SURYAWANSHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The court held that the typographical error may be corrected by substituting the appropriate words.
Summary
The appellants filed a motion seeking correction of a typographical error in the minutes of an order dated 19.08.2026. The error was in Clause V of paragraph 10 where the words "appellants/claimants" were mistakenly used. The court examined the request and determined that the error could be rectified without prejudice to the parties. It ordered that the words "respondent – Acquiring Body" replace the erroneous phrase. The corrected copy was to be uploaded, and the motion was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the court can correct a typographical error in the minutes of its own order?
Subjects
- court order
- typographical correction
- minutes
- procedural
- appeal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:37941
This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
(1) FA 1530 OF 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
930 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1530 OF 2020
RAMRAO MANIKRAO BIRADAR AND ANR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1533 OF 2020
MOHAN TATYARAO SURYAWANSHI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1531 OF 2020
CHANDRAKANT MANIK BIRADAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
…
Mr. V. G. Sakolkar, Advocate for Appellants/Claimants
…
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATE : 24.08.2026
PER COURT :-
. Motion for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 19.08.2026
is moved by the appellants thereby indicating typographical error at Clause V
of paragraph 10.
This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
(2) FA 1530 OF 2020
2. The typographical error is cured by substituting the words
“respondent – Acquiring Body” instead of appellants/claimants.
3. Corrections be carried out and corrected copy be uploaded.
4. Motion stands disposed of.
[AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.]
PRW
Checking your session…