Bombay High Court
ARTI ARUN RAJEversusRAMESH DAMU BHAVSAR AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The appeal was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The appellant, Satish Sangar, filed an appeal seeking enhancement of his claim and to hold the insurance company liable. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant on the hearing date. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the appeal and consequently dismissed it. The court ordered that the statutory deposit, together with any interest, be transferred to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Alibag, and that court fees be refunded as per the rules. The record and proceedings were to be sent back on a priority basis.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate procedural consequence for an appeal that is not prosecuted or represented before the court?
Subjects
- appeal
- non‑prosecution
- insurance claim
- procedural default
- Motor Accident Claims Tribunal
Judgment
2-FA-1981-2006.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SATISH
FIRST APPEAL NO.1981 OF 2006
RAMCHANDRA
SANGAR
Digitally signed by
SATISH RAMCHANDRA
Smt.Arti Arun Raje ...Appellant
SANGAR
Date: 2026.08.27
16:54:26 +0530 V/s.
Shri Ramesh Damu Bhavsar and Ors. ...Respondents
*****
No one is present:- On behalf of the Appellant.
Ms.Poonam Mittal:- Advocate for Respondent No.3–
Insurance Company.
*****
CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J.
DATE : 25th AUGUST 2026
P. C. :-
1. On 11th August 2026, no one was present on behalf of the
Appellant. Today also no one is present.
2. This is an Appeal by the Claimant for enhancement and making
the Insurance Company liable.
3. The Appeal is dismissed for non–prosecution.
4. Statutory deposit along with interest, if any, be transferred to the
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal–Alibag. Refund of Court Fees as per
the Rules. Record and proceeding be sent back on priority basis.
[S. M. MODAK, J.]
Satish Sangar 1/1
Checking your session…