Bombay High Court
VINOD KHIMCHAND BHATTversusASHOK R.RANE AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- KAMAL KHATA
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The appellant, Vinod Khimchand Bhatt, filed a first appeal before the Bombay High Court but remained unrepresented throughout the proceedings, including on 17th December 2025 and on the date of hearing, 8th January 2026. The court observed that the appellant showed no interest in prosecuting the appeal. No interim applications were filed or pursued by the appellant. Consequently, the court examined whether the appeal could continue in the absence of any representation or active prosecution. Finding that the appellant had abandoned the proceedings, the court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear or be represented?
Subjects
- civil procedure
- appeal
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- representation
Judgment
16-asfa-2255-2005.doc
Priyanka
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO.2255 OF 2005
Vinod Khimchand Bhatt ... Appellant
V/s.
Ashok R. Rane & Ors. ... Respondents
_______________________
None for the Appellant.
_______________________
CORAM : KAMAL KHATA, J.
DATED : 8TH JANUARY 2026.
P.C. :
1. None for the Appellant.
2. The Appellant has continued to remain unrepresented even
today as previously on 17th December 2025.
3. It appears that the Appellants are not interested in
prosecuting the Appeal.
4. Accordingly, the First Appeal and connected Interim
Applications, if any, stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…