Bombay High Court
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER LATUR MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION LATURversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ANR
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
The appeal is dismissed as there is no ground to intervene with the reference court's enhancement of compensation up to four times.
Summary
The Executive Engineer, Latur Medium Project Division appealed against a judgment and award dated 20 June 2008 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nilanga in LAR No. 165/1998 concerning a land acquisition proceeding from 1985. The appellant contended that the compensation enhanced by the reference court should not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer, relying on a State Government resolution (No. Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 3 November 2016, with corrigenda). The court examined the policy decision that the government would not challenge the reference if the enhancement was up to four times. Finding no reason to intervene, the judge dismissed the appeal. Consequently, any pending civil applications related to the matter were also disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the compensation enhanced by the reference court exceeds the four‑times limit prescribed by the State Government resolution.
Subjects
- land acquisition
- compensation enhancement
- government resolution
- appeal dismissal
- reference court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:46305
FA 2647/10
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
915 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2647 OF 2010
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER LATUR MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION LATUR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR
...
Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.S. Dande
...
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
Dated : September 30, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. Nobody appears for acquiring body/appellant. On the last occasion
also nobody appeared for acquiring body. Hence, this court requested Mr.
S.S. Dande, learned advocate to appear for acquiring body and work out the
matter as he was on the panel of acquiring body earlier. Mr. S.S. Dande,
learned advocate accepts the request of this Court graciously and workout
the matter.
2. As the acquisition proceeding is of the year 1985, heard finally with
the consent of Mr. S.S. Dande, learned counsel for acquiring body.
3. By this appeal, the Appellants assail the Judgment and award dated
20.6.2008 passed by the learned Jt. Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nilanga,
District Latur in LAR No. 165/1998.
4. Mr. S.S. Dande, learned counsel submits that the compensation
enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the
amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer.
5. In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy
decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution
No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with
FA 2647/10
2
Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government
Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation
is enhanced only upto four times.
6. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned
order. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed.
7. In view of dismissal of Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do
not survive and are disposed of accordingly.
( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. )
ssc/
Checking your session…