Bombay High Court
MAHA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONversusDATTARAM VIKRAM SUGAVE and ORS
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
The appeal is dismissed and the matter is disposed of in terms of the earlier judgment in FA Nos. 348/2003.
Summary
Maha Industrial Development Corporation appealed against Dattaram Vikram Sugave and others, seeking relief from a Civil Judge's award dated 2.1.2004. The appellant's counsel submitted that the dispute was identical to that decided in FA Nos. 348/2003 (Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation v. Sambhaji Mahadji Dhage & Ors.) and urged disposal in accordance with that judgment. The respondent's Attorney General concurred with this position. The Court, after accepting the admitted identical nature of the controversies, found no reason to depart from the earlier precedent. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed and any related civil application was disposed of, with no costs awarded.
Issues considered
- Whether the controversy in the present appeal is identical to that decided in FA Nos. 348/2003 and can be disposed of by reference to that judgment
Subjects
- appeal
- precedent
- civil procedure
- industrial development corporation
- judgment by reference
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:40592
FA 3028/08
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
16 FIRST APPEAL NO. 3028 OF 2008
MAHA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
VERSUS
DATTARAM VIKRAM SUGAVE AND ORS
...
Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.S. Dande
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. A.D. Wange
...
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
Dated : August 31, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. Heard the learned counsel for the acquiring body and the learned
AGP for State. None appears for respondent/claimant.
2. The present appeal arises out of the Judgment and Award dated
2.1.2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Biloli in LAR
No. 42/1998.
3. Mr. S.S. Dande, learned counsel for the appellant has tendered
across the Bar a copy of the judgment and order dated 10.2.2014 passed
by this Court in FA Nos. 348/2003 (Maharashtra Industrial Development
Corporation Vs. Sambhaji Mahadji Dhage & Ors.) and other connected
matters. He, therefore, submits that the controversy involved in the present
appeal is squarely covered by the judgment and order passed by this Court
in FA Nos. 348/2003 (supra), and consequently, the present appeal
deserves to be disposed of in terms thereof. The learned A.G.P. appearing
for respondent/State fairly concedes the aforesaid position.
4. Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsel
FA 3028/08
2
for the respective parties, and in view of the admitted position that the
controversy involved in the present appeal is identical to the one decided by
this Court in FA Nos. 348/2003 (supra), I see no reason to take a different
view. The present appeal, therefore, deserves to be disposed of in terms of
the said judgment and order. Hence, the following order:
ORDER
(i) The appeal is dismissed.
(ii) Civil application, if any, stands disposed of.
(iii) No costs.
( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. )
ssc/
Checking your session…