Bombay High Court
MR.BHAILAL BABU SOLANKI AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER WESTERN RAILWAY
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
- Bench
- ARIF S DOCTOR
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The appellants, Mr. Bhailal Babu Solanki and another, filed a first appeal against the Union of India (Western Railway). No counsel appeared for the appellants on the scheduled hearing date of 15 January 2020, nor on the subsequent hearing on 8 January 2026. The court noted that the appellants were not desirous of prosecuting the appeal. Accordingly, the court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the dispute were considered.
Issues considered
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non‑appearance of the appellants?
Subjects
- civil procedure
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- appellate jurisdiction
- non-appearance
Judgment
1/1 20-FA-495-2018 (C).DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 495 OF 2018
Mr.bhailal Babu Solanki And Anr. ...Appellants
Versus
Union Of India Through General Manager Western Railway ...Respondent
_______
None present for the Appellants.
_______
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : 8th JANUARY, 2026
P.C.
1. None has appeared for the Appellants.
2. The previous order also shows that none had appeared for the Appellants,
when the matter was listed on 15 th January, 2020.
3. Hence, it is clear that the Appellants are not desirous of prosecuting the
First Appeal, the same is thus dismissed for want of prosecution.
[ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.]
Areeb
Checking your session…