Bombay High Court
MR.RAJENDRA KASHINATH ROHEKAR AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL RAILWAY
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
- Bench
- ARIF S DOCTOR
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The appellants, Mr. Rajendra Kashinath Rohekar and another, failed to appear before the Bombay High Court for the first appeal filed against the Union of India (Central Railway). The court noted that the appellants also did not appear at the earlier hearing on 15 January 2020. Since the appellants showed no desire to prosecute the appeal, the court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the case were considered. The order was pronounced by Justice Arif S. Doctor on 8 January 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when an appellant fails to appear and shows no desire to prosecute an appeal?
Subjects
- civil procedure
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- high court
- non-appearance
Judgment
1/1 21-FA-498-2018 (C).DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 498 OF 2018
Mr.rajendra Kashinath Rohekar And Anr. ...Appellants
Versus
Union Of India Through General Manager Central Railway ...Respondent
_______
None present for the Appellants.
_______
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : 8th JANUARY, 2026
P.C.
1. None has appeared for the Appellants.
2. The previous order also shows that none had appeared for the Appellants,
when the matter was listed on 15 th January, 2020.
3. Hence, it is clear that the Appellants are not desirous of prosecuting the
First Appeal, the same is thus dismissed for want of prosecution.
[ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.]
Areeb
Checking your session…