Bombay High Court
STATE OF MAHAversusNAGU KESHAV JAGTAP
- Disposal
- PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
Holding
The court held that the order must be corrected to insert ‘under section 28 of the Act’ as requested.
Summary
The State of Maharashtra appealed a criminal conviction of Nilkantrao Apparão Patil. During the pendency of the appeal, a motion was filed to correct the minutes of an earlier order dated 24‑08‑2026, specifically to insert the words ‘under section 28 of the Act’ after the term ‘interest’ in paragraph 5 and clause (ii) of the operative part. The respondent’s counsel argued that the omission was a typographical error that needed rectification. Justice Thombre examined the submission and found no substantive prejudice, concluding that the correction was appropriate to reflect the intended reference to section 28. Accordingly, the court ordered that the correction be made, the revised order be uploaded, and any copies issued be deemed corrected. The motion was then disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the minutes of the order dated 24‑08‑2026 should be corrected to insert the reference ‘under section 28 of the Act’
Subjects
- order correction
- judicial minutes
- section 28
- procedural order
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38547
This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
8 FIRST APPEAL NO. 58 OF 2009
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
VERSUS
NILKANTRAO APPARAO PATIL
...
AGP for State/Appellant : Mr. S.N. Morampalle
Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjay Mundhe
...
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 59 OF 2009
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 60 OF 2009
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 57 OF 2009
…
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
Dated : Sept. 02, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. Not on board. Taken on board.
2. Motion is moved for speaking to the minutes of the order dated
24.8.2026 passed by this Court.
3. Mr. S.V. Mundhe, learned counsel for respondent submits that in para
5 and in clause (ii) of the operative part of the order, after the word
interest, the words ‘under section 28 of the Act’ were not typed and the
same needs to be done by correcting the the order accordingly.
4. In view of the submissions made above, I deem it appropriate that
the correction needs to be made accordingly.
5. The correction be made accordingly and corrected order be uploaded
6. Copies issued, if any, shall be deemed to be corrected accordingly.
7. Motion is disposed of.
( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. )
ssc/
Checking your session…