Bombay High Court
VANDANA W/O. GAUTAM WAGHMARE AND ORS.versusRANDHIRSINGH S/O. JASVANTSINGH PARMAR AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The appellants, Vandana W/o Gautam Waghmare & Ors., filed an appeal but failed to appear before the Court on the scheduled dates. The Court had previously warned the appellants to present themselves and proceed with the matter. On the hearing date of 7 February 2024, no representative for the appellants was present. The Court noted that the appellants had been given a last opportunity to prosecute the appeal and still failed to do so. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the appellants' failure to appear before the Court?
Subjects
- civil procedure
- non‑prosecution
- default judgment
- appeal dismissal
Judgment
10-FA-675-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO.675 OF 2022
Vandana W/o Gautam Waghmare & Ors. ….Appellants
V/s.
Randhirsingh S/o. Jasvantsingh Parmar & ….Respondents
Digitally signed by
Ors.
NILAM NILAM SANTOSH
SANTOSH KAMBLE
Date: 2024.02.08
----
KAMBLE 14:37:54 +0530
None for the Appellants.
Mr.Keshav Borhade, for the Respondents.
----
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 7th FEBRUARY 2024
P.C:-
. None present for the Appellants. On the last date last
chance was given to the Appellant’s to go on with the matter.
2. Today also none present for the Appellants.
3. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
N.S. Kamble page 1 of 1
Checking your session…