Bombay High Court
SHRADDHA PRAKASH KESARKAR AND ANR.,versusVRUSHALI KESHAV KUDASKAR AND 7 ORS.,
- Disposal
- Disposed of
Holding
The appeal is disposed of in accordance with the consent terms.
Summary
The appellants, Shraddha Prakash Kesarkar and others, filed a first appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Goa against respondents including Vrushali Keshav Kudaskar. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties reached a mutual settlement and executed consent terms on 10 July 2026, which were signed by all parties and their counsel. The court recorded the consent terms and marked them for identification, noting that they form part of the order. In view of the settlement, the court held that no issues remained for adjudication in the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of in accordance with the consent terms, and the court ordered the deletion of Respondent No.8 from the appeal as per Clause 22 of the consent agreement.
Issues considered
- Whether the appeal should proceed in light of the parties' mutual settlement and consent terms
Subjects
- consent decree
- settlement
- appeal disposal
- civil procedure
- mutual agreement
Judgment
0 FA 96 2019
vinita
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
FIRST APPEAL NO.96 OF 2019
SHRADDHA PRAKASH KESARKAR AND
ANR., ... APPELLANTS
Versus
VRUSHALI KESHAV KUDASKAR AND 7
ORS., ... RESPONDENTS
Ms Samiksha Vaigankar and Ms Riddhi Shirodkar, Advocates
for Appellants.
Mr Sarvesh Kamat Malyeker, Advocate for the Respondent
Nos.1 and 2.
Mr R. G. Ramani, Senior Advocate with Mr Vinayak Nevrekar
and Ms Neha Bhobe, Advocate for the Respondent No.7.
Ms Divya Parab and Ms Tanisha Mashelkar, Advocate for the
Respondent Nos. 4 and 5.
CORAM:- DR. NEELA GOKHALE &
AMIT S. JAMSANDEKAR , JJ.
DATED :- 10th July, 2026
P.C.
Leave is granted to the Appellant to delete Respondent No.8
from the Appeal in view of Clause 22 of the consent terms between the
other parties. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.
2. During the pendency of the proceedings, parties have arrived at
a mutual settlement, and they have placed on record consent terms dated
10.7.2026.
3. Consent terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for the purpose
of identification.
Page 1 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
4. All the parties have signed the consent terms. All the Counsel
representing the parties have also signed the consent terms.
5. All the parties are present in Court today. Counsel have
identified their respective parties. Parties have affirmed their signatures
as well as the contents of the consent terms. Consent terms will form
part and parcel of the order.
6. In view of the consent terms, nothing survives for consideration
in the present appeal.
7. The Appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms.
AMIT S. JAMSANDEKAR , J. DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.
Page 2 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 3 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 4 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 5 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 6 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 7 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 8 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 9 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 10 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 11 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 12 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 13 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 14 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 15 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 16 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 17 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 18 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 19 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 20 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 21 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 22 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 23 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 24 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
Page 25 of 26
10th July, 2026
0 FA 96 2019
AMIT S. JAMSANDEKAR , J. DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.
Signed by: VINITA VIKAS NAIK
Designation: Private Secretary
Page 26 of 26
Date: 13/07/2026 14:17:10
10th July, 2026
Checking your session…