Bombay High Court
RAMCHANDRA GANGADHAR KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Disposal
- PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
Holding
The court held that a typographical error in the record may be corrected to reflect the true intention of the parties.
Summary
The appellants filed a motion before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking correction of a typographical error in the chart of First Appeal No. 966 of 2019, where the land area was recorded as "8 R" instead of the correct "80 R". The learned Advocate for the appellants, G. K. Sontakke, highlighted the mistake and requested that the erroneous entry be rectified. The Court examined the motion and found no substantive dispute, merely a clerical error that could be corrected without prejudice to the parties. Accordingly, the Court ordered that the entry "8 R" be replaced with "80 R" and that the corrected copy be uploaded. The motion was thereafter disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether a typographical error in the court's chart can be corrected by amendment of the order
Subjects
- typographical error
- correction of record
- civil procedure
- High Court order
- chart amendment
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:46452
This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
1
FA 964 OF 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FIRST APPEAL NO. 964 OF 2019
SHIVAJI GANPATRAO KADAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 965 OF 2019
SANTOSH GANGADHAR KADAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 966 OF 2019
ARJUN BALASAHEB KADAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 967 OF 2019
RAMCHANDRA GANGADHAR KADAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 968 OF 2019
DATTA GANGADHAR KADAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 969 OF 2019
ANAND BALASAHEB KADAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
…
Mr. G. K. Sontakke, Advocate for Appellants
…
This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
2
FA 964 OF 2019
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATED : 7th October 2026
P.C. :-
. Motion is made for speaking to the minutes of order
dated 01.10.2026.
2. Mr. G. K. Sontakke, learned Advocate for the appellants
submits that due to typographical error in the Chart, the area
of land in First Appeal No.966 of 2019 is shown as 8 R instead
of 80 R.
3. The area “8 R” shall be replaced by “80 R”.
4. Corrections be carried out and the corrected copy be
uploaded.
5. Motion stands disposed of.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
PRW
Checking your session…