Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DATTA GANGADHAR KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposal
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

Holding

The court corrected the typographical error, changing the land area from 8 R to 80 R.

Summary

The appellants filed several first appeals against the State of Maharashtra. In First Appeal No. 966 of 2019, a typographical error in the judgment recorded the land area as "8 R" instead of the correct "80 R". The appellants, through counsel G. K. Sontakke, moved the court to correct this error. The bench, noting that the mistake was purely clerical and did not affect the substantive rights of the parties, ordered that the record be amended to read "80 R" and that the corrected copy be uploaded. The motion was thereafter disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a typographical error in a judgment can be corrected by the court without fresh proceedings?

Subjects

  • typographical error
  • correction of judgment
  • civil procedure
  • land measurement
  • High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:46453
                This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //



                                                                  1
                                                                            FA 964 OF 2019

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                           BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                             FIRST APPEAL NO. 964 OF 2019

                                           SHIVAJI GANPATRAO KADAM
                                                     VERSUS
                                      THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
                                                      WITH
                                          FIRST APPEAL NO. 965 OF 2019

                                          SANTOSH GANGADHAR KADAM
                                                    VERSUS
                                      THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
                                                     WITH
                                          FIRST APPEAL NO. 966 OF 2019

                                            ARJUN BALASAHEB KADAM
                                                    VERSUS
                                      THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
                                                     WITH
                                          FIRST APPEAL NO. 967 OF 2019

                                       RAMCHANDRA GANGADHAR KADAM
                                                    VERSUS
                                      THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
                                                     WITH
                                          FIRST APPEAL NO. 968 OF 2019

                                           DATTA GANGADHAR KADAM
                                                    VERSUS
                                      THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
                                                     WITH
                                          FIRST APPEAL NO. 969 OF 2019

                                         ANAND BALASAHEB KADAM
                                                   VERSUS
                                   THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
                                                      …
                         Mr. G. K. Sontakke, Advocate for Appellants
                                                      …
This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //



                                                  2
                                                                     FA 964 OF 2019



                                     CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
                                     DATED : 7th October 2026

         P.C. :-

         .         Motion is made for speaking to the minutes of order

         dated 01.10.2026.

         2.        Mr. G. K. Sontakke, learned Advocate for the appellants

         submits that due to typographical error in the Chart, the area

         of land in First Appeal No.966 of 2019 is shown as 8 R instead

         of 80 R.

         3.        The area “8 R” shall be replaced by “80 R”.

         4.        Corrections be carried out and the corrected copy be

         uploaded.

         5.        Motion stands disposed of.



                                                      ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
         PRW


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.