Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SMT. SHANTABAI BHAGWAN MOHITEversusSHRI. BHAGWAN GUNDU MOHITE

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The appeal is disposed of because the notice to the appellant was not served.

Summary

Smt. Shantabai Bhagwan Mohite filed a Family Court Appeal in 2019 against her husband, Shri Bhagwan Gundu Mohite. The appeal required service of notice on the appellant, but the bailiff report dated 25 August 2025 showed that the notice was returned unserved. The High Court noted the failure of service as a procedural defect. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented because the appellant could not be served. Consequently, the Court held that the appeal could not proceed and ordered it to be disposed of. The judgment was delivered by Justices Rajesh S. Patil and Abhay J. Mantri on 17 August 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether an appeal can be entertained when the notice to the appellant remains unserved?

Subjects

  • Family Law
  • Service of Notice
  • Appeal Procedure
  • Civil Procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-KOL:7654-DB
                                                                          10.FCA.50.2019.odt



                            IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
                                     CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 50 OF 2019

          Smt. Shantabai Bhagwan Mohite                              ...Appellant

                    Versus

          Shri. Bhagwan Gundu Mohite                                 ...Respondent
                                                   ***
           None for the Appellant.
                                                  ***
                                                CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL AND
                                                        ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
                                                DATE     : 17 AUGUST, 2026.
          P. C. :

          1.                 This Family Court Appeal filed in the year 2019 by the wife

          of the respondent.


          2.                 The office remark shows that the notice issued to the sole

          appellant returned unserved with bailiff remark on 25 August 2025


          3.                 In view of the same, the Family Court Appeal stands

          disposed of




                    (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)                      (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)




          Shrikant Malani                                                        Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.