Bombay High Court

NEHA KALPESH PATILversusKALPESH SOMNATH PATIL

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court accepted the mediated compromise and ordered a decree to be drawn in accordance with the consent terms.

Summary

In a family court appeal filed by Neha Kalpesh Patil against Kalpesh Somnath Patil, the matter was referred to mediation during pendency. The mediator submitted a report dated 11‑08‑2026 confirming a successful mediation and provided the compromise terms agreed by both parties. The court verified the terms with the parties present and their advocates, who admitted the settlement. Consequently, the court recorded the consent terms and ordered that a decree be drawn in accordance with the settlement. The appeal was thereafter disposed.

Issues considered

Whether the court may accept the mediated settlement and pass a decree based on the parties' consent

Subjects

family law
mediation
settlement
consent decree
appeal

Judgment

                                 (1)
                                                    50 FCA-66.2025.odt


     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                BENCH AT AURANGABAD
         50 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 66 OF 2025

                      NEHA KALPESH PATIL
                           VERSUS
                    KALPESH SOMNATH PATIL
                                 …
     Mr. Akshay Mulange, Advocate holding for Mr. Jitendra Patil,
                     Advocate for the appellant.
            Mr. S.B. Munde, Advocate for the respondent.
                                 …

                   CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                           VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                   DATED : 7 SEPTEMBER 2026.

Per Court :

1.     During pendency of this appeal, the matter was referred

to the Mediator.        The concerned learned Mediator then

forwarded report dated 11.08.2026 to this Court mentioning

that mediation is successful.      Alongwith the said report the

learned Mediator has also forwarded compromise terms

entered into by the appellant and respondent.



2.     We have verified the compromise terms and conditions

mentioned therein through the parties who are personally

present before the Court today.        The parties, who are duly

represented by their concerned advocates, have admitted the

terms and conditions of the compromise terms.
                               (2)
                                               50 FCA-66.2025.odt
3.    In view of the same, consent terms are taken on record

and accepted. The decree be drawn up accordingly in terms of

those consent terms.



4.    The appeal is disposed of.




(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)              (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
       JUDGE                                 JUDGE




VD_Dhirde

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…