Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

JITENDRA SHIHORI RAJBHARversusMANISHA JITENDRA RAJBHAR AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The decree of divorce by mutual consent is granted as the parties have mutually agreed to the settlement terms in compliance with Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Summary

The appellant husband and respondent wife filed an appeal challenging a decree of divorce dated 2016. During the pendency of the appeal, both parties executed Consent Terms on 03/09/2026, agreeing to dissolve their marriage by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The husband paid Rs.50,000 as full and final settlement, which the wife accepted, and the parties agreed that the minor children would remain in the wife's custody with visitation rights for the husband. The court verified the wife's consent and the terms of settlement, finding them compliant with statutory requirements. Consequently, the court ordered that a decree of divorce by mutual consent be drawn in accordance with the Consent Terms, thereby disposing of the appeal.

Issues considered

  • Whether the decree of divorce by mutual consent can be granted based on the executed Consent Terms.
  • Whether the settlement amount and custody arrangement satisfy the requirements of Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • divorce
  • mutual consent
  • settlement
  • custody
  • Hindu Marriage Act

Judgment

                                                                                 1/3                        2 FCA-73-26.odt

                                                   Salgaonkar

                                                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
MANDIRA MILIND   Digitally signed by MANDIRA
                 MILIND SALGAONKAR
SALGAONKAR       Date: 2026.09.03 18:23:14 +0530



                                                                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                                                  FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.73 OF 2026


                                                   Jitendra Shihori Rajbhar                          ..   Appellant
                                                                     Versus
                                                   Manisha Jitendra Rajbhar & Anr.                   ..   Respondents


                                                                                       …

                                                   Mr.Swatesh Tripathi i/b Mr.R.M.Upadhyay for the Appellant.
                                                   Mr.Chandan A. Dubey for the Respondent.


                                                                         CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE &
                                                                                 ASHISH S. CHAVAN, JJ.
                                                                         DATE : 03rd SEPTEMBER, 2026
                                                                                       ...

                                                   P.C:-

                                                   1.       During the pendency of the Appeal, the Consent Terms
                                                   under the signatures of the Appellant and Respondent dated
                                                   03/09/2026 are placed before us.                The Consent Terms also
                                                   bear the signatures of the Advocates for the Appellant-
                                                   husband and the Respondent-wife.
                                                            The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’
                                                   for identification.


                                                   2.       The   Appellant-husband          and    Respondent-wife           have
                                                   settled the dispute and differences arisen between them, which
                                                   had resulted into filing of an Appeal, raising a challenge to the
                                                   Judgment and Decree passed in Petition No.A-3021/2016 by
                          2/3                  2 FCA-73-26.odt

the Family Court at Mumbai.       The terms of settlement are
recorded in the Consent Terms, where it is mutually agreed
that the marriage solemnized between the parties on
24/06/2004 shall be dissolved by a decree of divorce by
mutual consent.
     Clause 3 of the Consent Terms record that the husband
has paid to the wife a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards full and final
settlement of all the claims of the wife and she has
acknowledged the said amount and made a categorical
statement that she shall not have further claim of any nature
whatsoever against the husband.
     The minor children born after the wedlock are agreed to
be in custody of the wife, though the husband is at liberty to
meet the children as per mutual wish and consent of the
children.
     The Consent Terms also contain a categorical statement
that pursuant to dissolution of marriage by mutual consent,
each party shall be free to lead his/her life independently
without any interference, objection or hindrance from the
other side.


3.   When specifically inquired with the Respondent-wife as
to whether she is agreeable to the terms and conditions and
apprised her about the settlement being effected by the
amount of Rs.50,000/-, which she has already received, she
consented before us that she wants to end the marital tie and
the Court may pass the decree of dissolution of marriage by
mutual consent.
                         3/3                2 FCA-73-26.odt

4.   In the wake of the understanding recorded in the
Consent Terms dated 03/09/2026 marked as ‘X’, the marriage
solemnized between the parties stand dissolved by the decree
of mutual consent passed under Section 13B of the Hindu
Marriage Act,1955.


5.   Decree be drawn in accordance with the Consent Terms.



(ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J.)              (BHARATI DANGRE, J.)


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.