Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KALPANA ATUL PAWARversusATUL SUBHASH PAWAR

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The appeal and all interim applications are disposed of in accordance with the parties' consent terms dated 5 October 2026.

Summary

Kalpana Atul Pawar appealed to the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, against Atul Subhash Pawar in a family court matter. Both parties filed consent terms dated 5 October 2026, indicating they had amicably settled their dispute and were residing together for the past three months. The learned counsel for each side presented the signed consent terms, which the court accepted as an undertaking. The court recorded the consent terms and, relying on the parties' agreement, disposed of the family court appeal in accordance with those terms. Consequently, all interim applications filed in the proceeding were also dismissed.

Issues considered

  • What is the effect of a consent decree filed by parties on the pending family court appeal and interim applications?

Subjects

  • Family Law
  • Consent Decree
  • Appeal Disposal
  • Interim Application
  • Settlement

Judgment

                                                                                    14-FCA-90-2025 (C).doc



                                     IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
                                              CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                           FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 90 OF 2025
                                                           WITH
                                         INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11194 OF 2025
                                                             IN
                                           FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 90 OF 2025
                      Kalpana Atul Pawar                                 ]   Appellant
                              versus
                      Atul Subhash Pawar                                 ]   Respondent
                                                            .....
                      Mr. S. R. Fakir, Advocate for Appellant.
                      Mr. Sachin M. Bhavar, Advocate for Respondent.
                                                            .....
                                                         CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL AND
                                                                    ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
         Digitally
         signed by
                                                         DATE     : 5th OCTOBER 2026.
         SHAILAJA
SHAILAJA SHRIKANT     P. C. :
SHRIKANT HALKUDE
HALKUDE Date:
         2026.10.05
         18:20:50
         +0530        1.         Both the learned counsel have tendered the consent terms dated 5

                      October 2026. They have informed us that parties have settled their dispute

                      amicably and residing together since last three months. They submit that the

                      said consent terms have been signed by their respective clients, who are

                      present in the Court. They identify the signatures of their respective clients

                      on the Consent the terms. Consent terms dated 5 October 2026 are taken on

                      record and marked as “X” for identification. Submissions made in the said

                      consent terms are taken as undertaking given to this Court. All undertakings

                      are also accepted.

                      2.            For ease of reference, scanned copy of the consent terms is

                      reproduced hereinbelow;


                      Shailaja                            1
               14-FCA-90-2025 (C).doc




Shailaja   2
               14-FCA-90-2025 (C).doc




Shailaja   3
                                                                    14-FCA-90-2025 (C).doc



3.         Family Court Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the consent terms

dated 5 October 2026. In sequel, all Interim Applications stand disposed of.

4.          All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.




 [ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.]                                       [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]




Shailaja                                 4


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.