Bombay High Court
ANITA PRAFULLA SAHASRABUDDHEversusAARYA PRAFULLA SAHASRABUDHE (MINOR)
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court may correct clerical and typographical errors in its orders.
Summary
In a guardianship petition, the High Court of Bombay noted that the order dated 24 September 2026 contained several spelling mistakes in the names of parties. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Saurabh Oka, sought correction of these clerical errors. The court examined whether it could amend its own order to rectify typographical mistakes without a fresh hearing. It held that such corrections are permissible as they do not affect the substantive rights of the parties. Accordingly, the court directed that the surname and given names be corrected as specified and that a corrected order be issued to the parties.
Issues considered
- Whether the court may correct spelling and typographical errors in its own order without a fresh hearing?
Subjects
- clerical correction
- judicial orders
- spelling errors
- civil procedure
Judgment
GP.25.2026.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
GUARDIANSHIP PETITION NO.25 OF 2026
Anita Prafulla Sahasrabudhe Petitioner
versus
Aarya Prafulla Sahasrabudhe Respondent
_______
Mr.Saurabh Oka for Petitioner.
None for Respondent
_______
CORAM : AARTI SATHE, J.
DATE : 30th September 2026
P.C.
1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.
2. The matter is listed for Speaking to the Minutes of order dated 24 th
September 2026. It is stated that there are spelling mistakes in the names.
3. It is directed that in the cause title of the order, the surname
`Sahasrabuddhe’ be corrected to `Sahasrabudhe’. In paragraph nos.1, 6, 7 and 9, the
name `Arya’ be deleted and substituted to `Aarya’. In paragraph nos.5 and 6, the name
`Shrikant’ be deleted and substituted by `Shreekant’. In paragraphh nos.5 and 6, the
name `Sandwadkar’ be deleted and substituted by `Chandwadkar’. In paragraph no.8
the name `Anuja Vinayak Kulkarni’ be deleted and substituted by `Anuja Vinayak
Dixit’.
4. Corrections to be carried out and corrected order be made available to the
parties.
Digitally signed
MANISH by MANISH
SURESHRAO
SURESHRAO THATTE (AARTI SATHE, J.)
THATTE Date: 2026.09.30
15:04:58 +0530
M.S.Thatte
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.