Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRAKASH VISHNU ZENDE SINCE DECD. THR. LRSversusTHE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATON (SECONDARY) PUNE AND ORS

Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The Court held that the cause title may be amended to reflect the death of the petitioner and substitution by his legal heirs.

Summary

During the pendency of Writ Petition No. 11417 of 2022, the petitioner, Mr. Prakash V. Zende, died, leaving his legal heirs as applicants. The applicants filed an interim application seeking permission to amend the cause title of the writ petition to reflect the change in parties. The Court examined the application and, finding no legal impediment, allowed it. The judges directed the applicants to effect the amendment and any consequential changes within four weeks. The interim application was thereafter disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the cause title of an ongoing writ petition can be amended to reflect the death of the petitioner and substitution by legal heirs

Subjects

  • amendment of cause title
  • death of petitioner
  • writ petition
  • interim application
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                                                19-10217-2025-IA=.doc



                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                             CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                            CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                        INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10217 OF 2025
                                                         IN
          Digitally
          signed by                        WRIT PETITION NO. 11417 OF 2022
          UDAY
UDAY      SHIVAJI
SHIVAJI   JAGTAP
JAGTAP    Date:
          2026.02.17
                       Prakash Vishnu Zende (Deceased)                        … Applicants
          18:37:38     Through the Legal Heirs Savita Prakash Zende
          +0530
                       (Bhosale) & Anr.
                                        Versus

                       The Director of Education (Secondary) Pune             … Respondents
                       and Ors.

                                                         ………….

                       Mr. Saurabh Pakale a/w Onkar Ghatage i/b Shankar Katkar for the
                       Applicants.
                       Mr. Narendra V. Bandiwadekar, Senior Advocate a/w Sagar A. Mane,
                       Rushikesh D. Jagdale, Neha Farakate for Respondent Nos. 5 to 7.
                       Mr. V.M. Mali, AGP for the Respondent - State.

                                                         ………….

                                                         CORAM :     R.G. AVACHAT AND
                                                                     AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ.

                                                         DATE      : 17th FEBRUARY, 2026.
                       P. C. :

                       1.        Mr. Pakale, learned counsel for the applicant would submit that

                       during pendency of the Writ Petition, the petitioner namely Mr. Prakash V.

                       Zende has expired leaving behind him the present applicants as his legal

                       representatives.



                       Uday S. Jagtap                     1 of 2
                                                             19-10217-2025-IA=.doc




2.       For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed.



3.       The applicant to carry out the amendment in the cause title of the

writ petition and other consequential amendment, within a period of four

weeks from today.



4.       The Interim Application stands disposed of.



     [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. ]                        [ R.G. AVACHAT, J. ]




Uday S. Jagtap                       2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.