Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MANGESH TUKARAM PADWALversusSUNITA MANGESH PADWAL

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court condoned the 30‑day delay and allowed the interim application.

Summary

Mangesh Tukaram Padwal filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 30‑day delay in filing a revision application against Sunita Mangesh Padwal. The applicant argued that the delay was justified, while the respondent opposed condonation. The Court, after hearing both sides, considered the reasons provided and the submissions of counsel. It held that the 30‑day delay could be condoned and allowed the interim application. Consequently, the revision application was ordered to be registered and listed for hearing on 30 June 2026, and the applicant was directed to deposit 50% of the arrears of maintenance.

Issues considered

  • Whether a delay of 30 days in filing a revision application can be condoned under the Civil Procedure Code

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • revision application
  • maintenance arrears
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                                             92-IA-10260-2025 (C).doc


                      Shubhada S Kadam


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                           CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                      INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10260 OF 2025
                                                         IN
                               CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO. 17842 OF 2025

                      Mangesh Tukaram Padwal                          ...Applicant/s
                      versus
                      Sunita Mangesh Padwal                           ...Respondent/s
                      _________________________________________________________________

                      Ms. Pooja Makhija (through VC) along with Mr. Shashank P., Advocate for
                      Applicant/s.
                      Mr. Nitesh S. Nevshe along with Ms. Shweta N. Nevshe and Ms. Arti
                      Bajpai, Advocate for the Respondent.
                      _________________________________________________________________

                                                            CORAM       :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                            DATE        :   17th JUNE, 2026.
                      P.C. :

                      1.         Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for
                      respondent.
                      2.         By this application, applicant is seeking condonation of 30 days’
                      delay for filing the revision application.
                      3.         Considering the submissions of both learned counsel and the
                      reasons mentioned in the application, the delay of 30 days for filing the
                      revision application is condoned. The interim application is allowed and
                      disposed of.
                      4.         The revision application be registered and be listed on 30 th June
SHUBHADA              2026.
SHANKAR
KADAM                 5.         The applicant shall deposit 50% of arrears of maintenance by
Digitally signed by
SHUBHADA SHANKAR
KADAM
Date: 2026.06.19
                      next date of hearing.
11:38:23 +0530




                                                                      (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)

                                                        Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.