Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SPARKLE BUILDCON PVT. LTD.versusSHRI PRAKASH BANDOPANT PATIL AND ORS.

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court condoned the 30‑day delay and allowed the filing of the Civil Revision Application.

Summary

Sparkle Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 30‑day delay in filing a Civil Revision Application, which had been rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court examined the reasons provided for the delay and, applying the principles of condonation, decided that the delay was excusable. Consequently, the Court ordered that the 30‑day delay be condoned, allowing the revision petition to be filed. The interim application was thereafter disposed of, and the parties were directed to register the Civil Revision Application. The judgment underscores the Court’s discretion to condone procedural delays when justified.

Issues considered

  • Whether a delay of 30 days in filing a Civil Revision Application can be condoned under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • Civil Revision
  • Order 7 Rule 11
  • procedural law
  • High Court of Bombay

Judgment

                                                                                          9-ia-10524-2025.doc

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                           INTERIM APPLICATION NO.10524 OF 2025
                                                            IN
                                    CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO.23619 OF 2025
                              Sparkle Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.     …..Applicant

                              In the Matter in Between:
                              Sparkle Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.             …..Applicant
                                    Vs.
                              Prakash Bandopant Patil & Ors.         …..Respondent
                              Mr. Swaroop M. Karade, for the Applicant.
                              Mr. S. S. Patwardhan, i/b. Mr. Ajay RajeNimbalkar, for the
                              Respondent No.1.
                              Ms. Ketaki Patil, i/b. Mr. Abhijit Adagule, for the Respondent No.4.
                                                               CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.
                                                                DATED : 17th JANUARY 2026
                              P.C.:-
                              1.       The Applicant has filed the application to condone the delay of

                              30 days in filing Civil Revision Application.          The Applicant has

                              challenged the order rejecting the application under Order 7 Rule 11

                              of the Code of Civil Procedure.

                              2.       Considering the reasons given in the application, the delay of

                              30 days is condoned.

                              3.       The Interim Application is disposed of.

                              4.       The office to register the Civil Revision Application.


                                                                  (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.)
           Digitally signed
           by RAJU
RAJU       DATTATRAYA
DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD
                              Gaikwad RD                                                                   1/1
GAIKWAD    Date:
           2026.01.19
           16:17:46 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.