Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BABASAHEB KRISHNA SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

Since the applicant had already served the sentence, the revision application was deemed infructuous and disposed of.

Summary

The applicant, Babasaheb Krishna Shinde, filed a criminal revision application challenging a prior order. He later submitted evidence that he had already completed the sentence imposed on him, attaching a xerox copy of a letter from Yerwada Central Prison, Pune. The respondent, State of Maharashtra, opposed the application. The court considered the submission that the sentence had been served, rendering the revision application infructuous. Consequently, the court disposed of the revision application and any other pending applications. No further orders were made.

Subjects

  • revision
  • sentence served
  • criminal procedure
  • infructuous application

Judgment

                                                                                          19-REVN-166-2020 (CR).doc

                             S.S.Kilaje


                                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                               CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 166 OF 2020
                                                                   WITH
                                                    INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1066 OF 2020
                                                                     IN
                                                   REVISION APPLICATION NO. 166 OF 2020

                                      Babasaheb Krishna Shinde                                 ...Applicant/s
                                      VERSUS
                                      State Of Maharashtra                                     ...Respondent/s

SONALI by
          Digitally signed
          SONALI
                                       _________________________________________________________________
                                      Mr. Varad V. Shinde i/b Mr. Sachin S. Thombare, Advocate for Applicant
       SATISH KILAJE
SATISH Date:
       2026.10.01
KILAJE 18:41:58
       +0530



                                      (Through VC).
                                      Mr. S. M. Mangaonkar, APP for Respondent-State.
                                      _________________________________________________________________

                                                                             CORAM     : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                             DATE      : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
                                      P.C. :

                                      1.         Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP.

                                      2.         Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant

                                      has undergone the sentence imposed on him hence this application is

                                      become infructuous. He tendered xerox copy of letter issued by Yerwada

                                      Central Prison, Pune.

                                      3.         Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant,

                                      Revision Application is disposed of.

                                      4.         All pending applications, if any, also disposed of.



                                                                                     (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)

                                                                       Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.