Bombay High Court
RAVINDRA VAIJIRAO TONAPEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. POLICE INSPECTOR
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- NITIN B SURYAWANSHI
Holding
The interim application is disposed of as the order in the anticipatory bail application has already been passed.
Summary
Ravindra Vaijirao Tonape filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 23 of 2026) before the High Court, Bombay, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur. During the pendency of that application, an interim application (No. 11 of 2026) was filed seeking relief. The court, after noting that an order had already been passed in the anticipatory bail application, disposed of the interim application. No further arguments or evidence were recorded. The disposition reflects the principle that once the main relief is decided, ancillary interim applications are no longer required.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition of an interim application filed after an order has been passed in the principal anticipatory bail application?
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- interim application
- criminal procedure
- high court
Judgment
1
5-IA-11-2026-ABA-23-2026 (CR).DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.11 OF 2026
IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 23 OF 2026
Ravindra Vaijirao Tonape ...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra,
Through Police Inspector ...Respondent
Mr. Pankaj Tapase, Advocate for Applicant.
Mr. Anand Subhash Shalgaonkar, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.
DATE : 13th JANUARY 2026.
P.C.
1. In view of the order passed in Anticipatory Bail Application,
Interim Application is disposed of.
(NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Digitally
signed by
SAJAKALI
SAJAKALI LIYAKAT
LIYAKAT JAMADAR
JAMADAR Date:
2026.01.14
20:03:07
+0530
Sajakali Jamadar
Checking your session…